Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: 1/2/11

Googles YouTube supporting Terrorism?

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

YOU DECIDE:

YouTube took down this video for violation of TOS.
Details here: http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/205741.php

Its mirrored in several locations.

While Googles YOUTUBE leaves up terrorist videos recruiting and training terrorists.
There is reason to believe Google has been penetrated, the Army, CIA both were. Google immune?

Google YOUTUBE penetrated by al Qaeda is one explanation for this conduct.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/12/google-penetrated-by-al-qaeda.html

Its making more and more sense.

The song questions Islams Sloth.

Muslims appear as cowards, through
inaction, sloth, they have allowed this
terrorism by a delusional damaged
mind to flourish.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2009/10/islams-sloth.html

Who the 50 top Muslims in the world.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2009/11/top-50-muslims-in-world.html

Islam is not involved in Terrorism, but by inaction, sloth
they allow terrorism to flourish..

Gerald
Anthropologist

.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Is Google Evil?

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Google's Youtube supporting ...

Share |

Thousands of dead birds: Jet Stream?

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Out of my field here, But:

Valley exit jet, is a form of jet stream.

Could jet streams be dipping down and cold enough and enough wind speed to kill flying birds?

The weather has been freaky enough world wide to support some

way out speculation.

Reports in now from many countries flocks of dead birds.

But jet streams don't account for dead fish? Do they?

If this is accurate then people caught in the open could be at

risk.

Gerald

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: DHS alert;all died at same time

.

Map mass deaths.

.

Share |

Anonymous sets new paradigm.

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Anonymous sets new paradigm.

We have talked about this before.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/02/cyber-vigilantes.html

World Government are going to have to adjust
The Internet is awakening to its own power.
The WWW is slowly realizing it has power,
collectively awakening as its own power.
Both Wikileaks and Anonymous are part of this
new paradigm.

As most new paradigms the kinks are

being worked out, the US Government

is assisting wikileaks in developing criteria

for what can be and cannot be leaked.
By force of law.

Wikileaks is not fully aware of the arena

they are playing in.

In this arena they play for keeps.

And they are playing in the big league.

Wikileaks is trying to get the rules down

as it develops.

But an error can result in deaths of wikileaks

staff.

The boys in this league perform assassinations

as a matter of state policy.

Many are not as well behaved as the US intellignece

agencies.

Russia has been having a problem with its journalist

dying for just opposing the Russian Government.
If they even think release A+ B +C = agents death,
They could retaliate without further proof.

If wikileaks releases info that results in deaths of

intelligence assets or agents some Governments

will take vengeance.

And wikileaks has become an embarrassment for

Anonymous, they keep telling me they are all about

stopping all censorship and are defending wikileaks

on that basis.

But Julian has just threatened the Guardian paper

with a law suit if the paper releases the Stolen

US cables wikileaks gave the paper.

Now I don't know how Anonymous will process

that bit of censorship?

Wikileaks suckered Anonymous into supporting

them, while Wikileaks defrauds donors.

Wikileaks has raised $1.3 million dollars,

$600,000 is missing and no public audit,

while Mr. Manning rots in prison and has

received nothing, zero zip from Julian and

wikileaks, while flogging him around as a

fund raising doll.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: wikileaks FRAUD

And Julian will gross another cool Million

on his book deal, Julian got plenty of

defense money for his rape charge

and they let Mr.Manning their Info

source swing in the wind.

When will the public catch on?

But what is Anonymous to do, they

went to bat for a corrupt wikileaks,

and are being made fools of.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/12/anonymous-on-ropes.html

Julian is engaged in the very censorship

that Anonymous fights so hard for.

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/01/vf-wikieaks/#more-22511

And just how did the US Army let a down load

of that size go un-noticed?

This has already hurt info sharing, between the

Army and State Dept, and will dribble through

the rest of the Intelligence community.

We are living through and new era of power and

info sharing, the paradigm is being formed by all

sides into a workable form.

Julian will get burned, Wikileaks will be exposed,

some leading the DDOS attacks will be arrested

at Anonymous, and the Army and Intelligence gathering

arms will tighten up protocols.

In the end it will come out as a workable paradigm,

wikileaks replaced, and Anonymous smarter, embarrassed,

smaller and more cautious but still in existence.

Anonymous seems to have confused, censorship and

privacy and the differences between them.

cen·sor (snsr)
n.
1. A person authorized to examine books, films, or other material and to remove or suppress what is considered morally, politically, or otherwise objectionable.

Releasing US wrong doing could fall under censorship.

pri·va·cy (prv-s)
n.
1.
a. The quality or condition of being secluded from the presence or view of others.

Releasing all the cables just because they are secret is a violation of

privacy.

And Anonymous had no idea they were defending a corrupt

group in wikileaks. They censor their funding and expenses.

The resolution of this new paradigm is going to be

painful to many, but in the end will empower the citizens

of the World, and hold the Governments more accountable.

Gerald

Anthropologist

.

Share |

Genius Readers 01.06.10

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Chinese, Arabs, Japanese.

Share |

Anonymous targets Wall St Bank

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Boy do I have mixed feelings about this.

Scary comment on their page:
Another step backwards. Seriously, you really want to allow this as a press release?
Seems a little errrr, childish?
What a joke. There's 4chan for this kind of content.

Anonymous harassment capabilities are remarkable.

Gerald

.

Share |

The Secret Cyber War.

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

The Secret Cyber War.

There are several secret wars ongoing.

Secret special ops teams.

NSA secret Stuxnet, nobody can prove its them.

and other cyber operations.

The FBI has a secret cyber arm running 24/7.

The military has a few secret cyber wars in theater.

And there is a secret civilian cyber war,

we are part of that.

Our operations are designed to keep out of the

way of Federal operations.

Before release of sensitive intel we have given

the Feds a 24 hr kill notice, where we would

kill the story delete the intel to NSA standards.

They have activated the kill order only a few times.

We have tracked cells in Afghan, Germany,

and USA.

We have Accidentally uncovered backdoors on

terrorist computers that lead to NSA and reported

the method that lead to the discovery.

We have had moles in al qaeda and they offered

us money thinking we were terrorist operating

in CONUS, but the FBI killed the money transfer.

We have tracked al qaeda after 341 lbs of nuclear

material from an European University.

And these are just the operations we can talk about.

We hunt terrorist hackers and hacker groups and

webmasters. And monitor and report wana bees.

We receive death threats and fatwas monthly.

We have had bot attacks from over a hundred

PCs and removed the threat.

Numerous attempts to penetrate our servers,

and some successful got into our hony pot.

A few self defense operations taking out the

attackers and disrupting terror operations.

And taking down just a few terrorist sites.

Infiltrating terror groups and forums scraping

intel and copying over 600 terrorist sites in their

entirety.

We run a very effective counter surveillance program

And over 100,000 BSU's.

And received some nice kudos from the Feds.

and have a good reputation among foreign

intelligence services.

Kudos while we were down

We have made some errors, a cyber weapon

went off by accident taking out two of our PCs,

and Accidentally were tracking one of our own moles

which was reported to the FBI as a terrorist in CONUS.

Our BSU's were better than even we thought.

We took measure to cloak our moles that we thought

the BSU's couldn't get through.

We maintain a good cyber war element for

self defense with a strong offensive capability,

rules of engagement, stealthed and cloaked giving

anonymity and freedom of movement in all cyber

realms.

And strong tracing and tracking methods across the

entire WWW.

And an intensive demographics operation

to target our audience, which Google

is screwing with, a rogue Google employee.
We suspect Google has been penetrated
by al qaeda, the US Army and CIA were,
is Google exempt?

Google looking to close our blog

Paradigm Intel and an paradigm engine help point

the way for operations and intel collection.

And actively run a "Social Change Engine".

And counter propaganda and counter spin

operations.

Inside view of IATT..

We thank the 200 or so who support us

in out Battalions. Company "C"

And think we have made a difference

in the GWOT.

Gerald

War Anthropologist

.

Share |

Open response to General Dempsey

His Article:

http://tradoclive.dodlive.mil/2011/01/05/mission-command-third-in-dempsey-six-part-series/

Response to General Dempsey article.

The current military is a far cry from when I served in the 70's.

Your adaptation and paradigm reconfiguration cycle times have been

greatly shortened and very agile.

And the restraint of terminal power is to be commended.

I'm continually amazed and proud of your actions.

Your last paragraph is instructive, and also applies to Cyber war,

ie Stuxnet, warfare without casualties, and destruction of the Target.

A difficult new standard for war. The principles of this type of cyber

war also need to be institutionalized and joint operations planed and

practiced.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/10/stuxnet-30-most-powerful-weapon-ever.html

There are unaddressed problems with Cyber war, which so far have been ignored:

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2011/01/cyber-war-more-us-collateral-dead.html

In Afpak theater the allies are working from crossed motivations.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2011/01/paki-wont-go-after-sanctuarys.html

This tends to short circuit victory.

Another paradigm that should be reconsidered is "Gifting" billions,

ans move towards "Investing".

This paradigm also provides a clean honorable way to exit Afpak

with Bin Laden or his body.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2011/01/us-could-be-out-of-afpak-in-6-mos.html

As always the Military is on the cutting edge of mankind's most

difficult endeavor, War, and the USA is handling it most honorably.

Your doing an amazing job in an impossible context.

Your nation is grateful, THANK YOU.

Gerald

War Anthropologist

.

Share |

Privacy Yours or mine?

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

I had an interesting conversation with a wikileak supporter.

About my posts on wikileaks violating privacy,

releasing secret cables that pertained to no wrong doing.

And how even Governments are entitled to privacy.

Especially when the cables don't relate to ANY wrong

doing, many just gossip.

His response was that if your not doing any thing wrong

you don't need privacy.

And said he had nothing to hide.

So I asked permission to violate his privacy and

look at his surfing history, the sites he visited, and maybe

his email.

He gave me permission,

told me to go ahead and look.

I reported back to him some of the Adult

sites he visited and that he had erased from his

history, and he changed his mind about privacy.

I would never expose him and have deleted all

data I gathered, to NSA standards. Resealing his

privacy.

But that points to the importance of privacy,

especially our own.

And you should be careful who you give

permission to.

Anonymous has been talking about lighting

up Jester, exposing his true identity.

Because of the anti-terror work he does they

could be putting his life in danger.

I receive Death threats, fatwas every month, some

months more, Taliban webmasters and

some insurgent hackers really don't like me,

lighting either of us could put

our lifes in danger.

I'm hoping Anonymous will consider that and

not light up Jester.

I've stayed out of the fray with Anonymous

except for commenting, because of past

work I've done with them. Iran.

And Anonymous never forgets.

And hope to work with them in the future

on projects we both agree on.

If you fired the "Low orbit Ion Cannon"

here are some precautions you might

want to consider.

Prep for FBI raid

Wikileaks crossed the line when they released

EVERYTHING, not just the items related to wrong

doing.

Releasing 'Wrong doing' is one thing.

Releasing everything is a violation of Privacy.

And they are using Manning for fund raising

$1.3 million for Wikileaks, Manning $0.o

Eventually the public will see this.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Wikileaks defrauding donors

Gerald

Anthropologist

.

Share |

Strike team on standby

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

BSU's Counter surveillance report:

Cyber Strike team on standby.
Swift-Silent-Deadly

Target if it goes active in Idaho
WWW Packet inspection, ID and your packets deleted for life time if engaged.
Just the start.
Nampa ya you saw it, G

Gerald
Waitin on the Green if he goes Active.

Share |

US could be out of Afpak in 6 mos w/Binny

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

US could be out of Afghan and Paki CLEAN in 6 mos w/Binny.

US went into Afpak to get al qaeda 911 perps.
US wants a safe and secure Afghan and wants
to leave Afghan.

The current paradigm has players at cross proposes.
Afpak wants the $20 billion each they get a year for
going after terrorism
Paki wants the Taliban as a force multiplier and gives
them sanctuary.

Paki has many reservations about US leaving Afghan.

US did once before and left them flat after the defeat

of the Russians.

Both Afghan and Paki are worried about US leaving

and the loss of funding.

The current war paradigm works at cross proposes.

Both Afghan and Paki look at the GWOT as a $20

billion cash cow.

Once they kill al Qaeda they also kill the cash cow.

If US leaves without killing al qaeda, it leaves the door

open for either Afghan or Paki to enable al qaeda to

reconnect to the GWOT $20 billion cash teat.

And Paki will not go after the sanctuaries and kill off

al qeada, here is why, CLICK

What is US going to do with / for Afghan/Paki after

the US leaves?

An unlikely exit from Afghanistan Not encouraging

The Republicans present a major problem.

The GOP supported billionaires $700 billion

tax cut while rejecting unemployment payments,

during a recession.

Absolutely no common sense.

And the GOP will not be supportive of a program

supporting Afghan and Paki even to keep terrorism

down, the GOP simply can't be trusted and Afpak

knows this.

Karzi wants to start a joint government with the Taliban,

and Paki will use Taliban against Afghan.

And both have a big financial motive to enable terrorism

in CONUS, to reconnect to the $20 billion teat.

But there is a way out and around all these problems.

Killing al qaeda, and controlling Taliban.

Give Afpak 6 months to turn over Bin Laden, Omar et al,

Dead or alive, and get a contract for $20 billion each over 5 yrs.

$4 billion each yr for 5 yrs with option to renew.

No Bin Laden, Omar etal no deal.

But US isn't on the hook for the $40 billion.

Pull in the Wall St Bankers, to sell Afghan and Paki Peace bonds.

The first year the principle is Guaranteed by US Gov.

Foreign Peace /WAR Bonds.

Paki and Afghan have to invest the money, with FBI or

equivalent oversight and cover all interest payments.

After the death or turn over of al qeada et al,

they get the money to invest in the infrastructure.

We get the insurgents they get to stay on the Cash Teat,

and they build and develop the country.

With over sight, if the money is stolen or wasted

through corruption then Wall St will not deliver the

next years $4 billion in Bonds.

The market weighs the progress and profits,

AfPak build their countries and develop minerals

in a transparent method that Wall St will accept

or they loose future funding.

In the first year to get it started US guarntees the

first $4 billion to each Afghan and Paki.

US get Bin Laden, Omar al Qaeda etal.

This paradigm realigns all motives to the same end.

'Profits, end of terrorism'.

After al qaeda is gone, its up to Afghan and Paki

to make it work, Wall St provides the funding,

based on profits after first year, if Afpak

work together and invest stop corruption then

they will have access to US capital markets with

some support of US Gov.

While I consider Wall St Banks criminal they
would be successful in determining how the
money was spent and keeping it going for a
profit.

GoldmanSachs

If its profitable then Wall St will attach to the

Afpak teat, by profits alone.

And Afpak will grow into a safe secure infrastructure.

Defeat terrorism on the basis of profits.

If they fail, its on their heads, US provided

the opportunity.
And would offer other assistance in curbing
terrorism but on a different level, special ops .

All US is doing is providing Afpak a chance

to fund a great and profitable infrastructure

and better life for their citizens and end

terrorism.

US Win

Afghan Win

Paki Win

Wall St Win

Terrorist loose.

Introducing a self funding paradigm for

Afpak development and safety.

US leaves CLEAN,

with Terrorist paradigm at a partial end.

Exit with honor, and the onus on Afpak.

Gerald

War Anthropologist

Post Script:

To pull out of Afpak before terrorist are defeated
is an invite another attack on CONUS.

Our paradigm Intel on what happens when US does leave with current Paradigm.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/12/paradigm-intel-after-withdrawal.html

.

Share |

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank

Saturday, January 08, 2011

Googles YouTube supporting Terrorism?

Friday, January 07, 2011

Thousands of dead birds: Jet Stream?

Anonymous sets new paradigm.

Thursday, January 06, 2011

Genius Readers 01.06.10

PREVIOUS POSTS

Anonymous targets Wall St Bank

The Secret Cyber War.

Wednesday, January 05, 2011

Open response to General Dempsey

Tuesday, January 04, 2011

Privacy Yours or mine?

Monday, January 03, 2011

Strike team on standby

US could be out of Afpak in 6 mos w/Binny

An unlikely exit from Afghanistan Not encouraging

About Me

Links

Twitter Updates

Previous Posts

Archives