More of our INTEL
Anonymous to weaponize stuxnet?
There is a file on the Internet with
Stuxnet in a decompiled mode.
The first step in rewriting or changing the code,
is to break it open so you can read it.
Does Anon have the capability to re weaponize
Stuxnet, to re target it, NO.
Our paradigm Intel indictes Stuxnet was so
written not even the Russians, (read RBN ),
or China can't reweaponize Stuxnet.
But the game model is there, the road map
for the first surgical cyber mutipl-headed missile
There is nothing new in stuxnet, just old technology
pushed to the limit and combined in a very comprehensive
The anon operation to put Stuxnet out there in a decomplied
mode was rogue operation,
and not approved by top levels of Anonymous.
Anonymous is herding cats, young punks, and their
retribution is swift and heavy among their own members.
Animal rights groups would not approve.
Think about what it takes to discipline young cyber
punks in cyber space.
Think about that age groups tendency to revolt against
authority, Anonymous moto applies to the membership also.
Would Anonymous weaponize stuxnet, I don't think so,
they have a stated policy against it.
Would they bastardize it and use it for penetration activities
And their attacks on the banks, would they be angry enough
to erase bank records, rob banks?
So far all of Anonymous attacks have been temporary,
without any real damages, more of a hindrance, attention
PR motivation attention getting. Not attack for propose
of doing real damages.
Does Anonymous have the capability to bastardize
Stuxnet, NO but axillary groups do. The Groups
Anonymous draws on for heavy hacker work.
Like HBGary's Aaron Barr operation.
Was a nic piece of work, but to be fair
to Aaron, their is NO security on the WWW now.
In what case might Anonymous use a cyber WMD,
or guided surgical strike cyber missile?
Is there a case where Anonymous would
do real damage?
In the words of one of Anonymous's own
cadre, Commander X, their maybe extenuat circumstances.
He was interviewed recently and I recognized his style of writing.
His demeanor and temper are easily recognizable.
I got a few ass chewings from him for not producing Intel fast enough
or a poor lead, and misunderstanding orders.
I have worked with/for him on the Iran Anonymous operation.
I have no intel on him and all records were deleted to NSA standards,
related to our Iran operations. I am proud of the work we all did on
re-connecting Iranian people to the web and taking down Iran regime
sites, and other operations.
And salute him on that operation.
One of the stories floating about after the hack is that HBGary had decompiled code for Stuxnet, and now that's in the hands of the Anons. Any truth to that?
Absolutely none. Anonymous does NOT create viruses or other malicious code. Ever. It's one of the guiding principles and it is never broken.
( But it is on the WWW, and attributed to an Anonymous member, )
So if the PLF had access to Stuxnet, you wouldn't use it against an evil dictatorship?
We have different rules, that’s all I can say. We have a bit more flexibility in those areas with the choices we can make. But IF we did something like that it would be a completely Black Op and no one would ever know of it.
And he goes on to say:
But Egypt and Iran (and now Bahrain) are certainly not the only targets Anon has picked over the last few years. Scientology, for one. WikiLeaks (or rather, its enemies). Soulja boy???
Look... Scientology pre-dates the PLFs relationship with Anon Ops. I think there was a moral imperative, but I question how large a one. I think it was a hysterical fight against a truly deserving enemy that maybe didn't need to happen, but whatever. As for defense of WikiLeaks and Julian.... Let me say something for the record. If they harm one hair upon Julian Assange’s head, or if they destroy or damage WikiLeaks - the PLF WILL bring down the wrath of f***ing god on them.
What does "bringing down the wrath of f***ing god on them"
Is prison "harm one hair upon Julian Assange’s head"
does that produce Anonymous wrath of god?
I think Anonymous is making a paradigm error here,
they are used to dealing with Law Enforcement, and
are adept at it. He has been in FBI custody before.
Anonymous are running the risk of bringing down
the full weight of the GWOT apparatus down on them.
But Anonymous has no experience in dealing with the
guys in Black, if anonymous were viewed as a real
security threat to US, wet teams would be considered.
The stuxnet issue isn't so much about the weapon its
self as it is about possible Anonymous motivations.
Has the decompling of stuxnet moved al qaeda one step
closer to a effective cyber weapon?
Bin Laden with edema
Was this a motivation? Or even a consideration?
It doesn't look like it, and feels like a rogue operation.
I've asked directly why he released Stuxnet
on line and am still waiting for a reply. His helpers:UPDATE has deleted his Tweet regarding
the link to the web page with his name on it.
It feels like Anonymous is trying to distance its self
from this action. But then?
He Has now posted this:
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank:
Anonymous on the ropes
Would Anonymous go nuclear?
Julian seems to be their fair haired boy,
who can do no wrong.
Anonymous reaction to his imprisonment
will be measured, and I don't think Anonymous
would take on NSA, but there is the consideration
of cyber suicide rogue operations, with the capability
to do significant damages.
What would they target?
The target would be a major player involved
in hurting their fair haired boy; Julian.
Justice Dept and attorneys
FBI and agents
CIA, looking to leak docs
or even NSA if involvement
Something they would perceive as a clear moral imperative.
A big statement for Anonymous and their reputation.
I hope Anonymous survives this Wikileaks operation.
And as of today we have deployed no operations against
Anonymous, and have perceived no operations
against us, but we are prepared.
We wish Anonymous the wisdom to find their
way through this and hope for their survival.
We have new paradigm on Stuxnet hidden
capabilities, watch for post.
Interesting side note:
Thought for Anonymous.
I've been told by a few bloggers,
Rule #1 is you don't talk about
Anonymous, fear of retribution.
Fear of the "defenders of free speech"
on WWW. Are you turning into that
which you fight?
Read: Anonymous Tells Westboro Baptist Church
to Cease and Desist
While Westboro enjoys the right to free speech,
they maybe subject to sanctions from the public,
not saying its right, but I understand,
and Expressing my right to free speech,
I find Westboro is an abomination, disgusting.G
Jawa hackers Burned.