How to change ISI
It is our intention to expose ISI personnel
criminal activities until ISI becomes a
protector of the Pakis or is disbanded.
The ISI sufferers from an inferiority complex,
And is overly sensitive to criticism.
Easily humiliated and fears bad press.
Many Pakis remain supportive to ISI
no matter what they do, the ISI has
an exemplary record in protecting Pakistan.
But at some point the ISI psyche was warped,
and it became acceptable for ISI to kill its own
people.
There is evidence of Serial murder,Psychopath. working with in ISI
http://warintel.blogspot.com/2011/06/paradigm-intel-saleemshahzads-assassin.html
70 reporters murdered and ISI has not caught
even One perp, maybe cause they are the assassins?
ISI is a remarkable Intelligence agency,
one of the smallest and most remarkable in the far East.
It has been run by some Geniuses, doing so much
with so little, but it has gone astray.
It has one of the hardest charters in the world.
On one hand dealing with tribesmen who reject
the Paki government and would kill Government
interlopers for even visiting. Multiple languages,
religions and religious fanatics, complicate the mission
to no end.
And a kindred, related enemy of their own home grown
proxy army of irregulars, raiding into Pakistan from Afghan.
And one of the biggest Nuclear arsenals in the ME or Europe.
On the other hand an ally USA the biggest and most powerful
Military in the world, who spend more than the top 20 most
powerful Militarys in the World combined.
And the US has violated Pakistan sovereignty illegally,
but for good reason ( I didn't say 'leagal' reason ) leading to
the death of the world's most wanted terrorist, OBL...
Personally I think this should be forgiven, a small Paki
sacrifice to remove the worst of the worst of the
terrorists, the MacDaddy. May he Burn in Hell.
This paradigm has developed from a complicated set
of circumstances, Pakis proxy irregular army Paki Taliban
raiding into Afghan from Paki sanctuary's.
While the ISI cannot completely control their Taliban
they can and do influence them.
The US has resorted to attacking the raiding Taliban
coming from Paki by attacking them with Drones.
And the Pakistan Army and ISI feels they need this
irregular Taliban army to defend themselves against
India. And thats another whole history.
So it has become a battle of not of laws, but expediency.
US fears another 911, launched from Pakistan or Afghanistan,
Mumbai promoted shadows of 911 all over again and the
discovery of ISI's connections to the attack on India
cracked the US / Paki trust on the American side.
Taking out OBL without giving Paki notice cracked
the trust on the Paki side.
Pakistan has a point US has abandoned Pakistan
3 or 4 times before, and you can't trust the
American GOP. And this is an issue US must over
come, US will not abandon Paki again.
And the Pakistan Mil / ISI are involved in
Illegal criminal insurgent operations.
But there are reasons both must work this
out.
Our concern is ISI killing Paki civilians and
reporters.
To hold ISI accountable for extra-judicial
killings and abuse of process and threats
against reporters.
And provide evidence of Treason, killing Pakistanis.
And are willing to request assistance from
Anonymous and Lulzsec if needed.
We have connections to both.
ISI has demonstrated remarkable incompetence
or culpability in the case of OBL.
Either way ISI is a failure.
ISI's connection to the Mumbai attack is undeniable.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Mumbai Internet Chase
And ISI's paradigm of "defense in depth" employing
and supporting the Taliban has Put Pakistan civilians in
harms way, resulting in many deaths.
It is not our objective to attack ISI, just provide
the Civilian Government and Pakistan people with
evidence of ISI treason, and leave it to them.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: ISI guilty of TREASON
We will deploy operations against ISI if they
undertake extra judicial killings against the
civilian powers, civilians or reporters.
Three previous army chiefs—military dictators Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, and Pervez Musharraf—were forced to step down in part because they had lost the confidence of the powerful corps commanders, a group of about a dozen top generals that defers to the chief but nonetheless operates in a largely consensual manner. Ayub and Yahya both lost wars against India, in 1965 and 1971 respectively. (Though in strictly military terms the 1965 war was a stalemate, the Pakistani army viewed it as a defeat.) Musharraf was eased out after a protest movement by lawyers—amplified by a feisty media that Musharraf himself had fostered—made him so unpopular that the army began to lose face as an institution for backing him.
What does this mean for Kayani? There’s no question that his reputation, and that of the army, has taken a battering over the past six weeks. The bin Laden raid was followed by an audacious assault by Islamist militants on PNS Mehran, a naval base in Karachi, and the murder of a prominent Pakistani journalist, Saleem Shahzad, allegedly by agents from the army’s intelligence wing, Inter-Services Intelligence. (The ISI denies killing Shahzad.) Many of Pakistan’s most prominent journalists and writers are publicly blaming the army for bringing the country to its present pass. Some accuse it of being inept (Abbottabad, PNS Mehran), others of being malignant as well (the Shahzad murder).
On going team investigation into the Shahzad assassination:
http://warintel11.wetpaint.com/page/%23SaleemShahzad%27s+Leads+Investigation
But what appears to have angered the powerful generals most is the lack of trust displayed by the unilateral raid — and the strategic vulnerability that it exposed.
Pakistan’s army chiefs are deposed by fellow generals, not
by civilian governments, or its people.
At some point the Military/ ISI accepted the killing of reporters
as a measure of protecting their reputations.
Rather than admitting errors, mistakes and short comings they
kill and intimidate reporters and the Paki people.
And this policy was co opted to cover corruption and dealings
with insurgents and criminal and terrorist activities.
The Pakistan Military and ISI have made themselves
vulnerable, thats why they kill reporters. Which in turn
makes them more vulnerable.
Exposing ISI to the light of day, will change them,
will get the Military Generals to force ISI to change.
The Paki Generals are after all Pakistani,
and BAD PRESS creates changes.
Exposure leads to loss in confidence, loss of FACE.
Which the Paki Military respond to.
ISI investigation:
http://warintel11.wetpaint.com/page/ISI
The people have the power to change ISI,
we hope to provide the legal ammunition.
Sourced from:
http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2011/06/16/pentagon-watching-fate-of-pakistani-general/
http://blog.american.com/2011/06/a-colonel%E2%80%99s-coup-in-pakistan/
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2077838,00.html#ixzz1Pdl2h9O5
http://blog.american.com/2011/06/a-colonel%E2%80%99s-coup-in-pakistan/
Pakistani reporters and investigators are KEY to a better safer stronger
Pakistan.
#SaleemShahzad:"If I hold back and don't do my job,
I might as well just make tea"
Ask your self: "ARE YOU MAKING TEA?"
Everything you wanted to know about ISI
Pakistan's Inter-Service Intelligence - C-SPAN Video Library: http://cs.pn/mygG2W
Help us bring ISI back to its TRUE GREATNESS,
PROTECTING THE PAKI PEOPLE NOT KILLING THEM.
INFORM.
Gerald
War Anthropologist
We welcome Informants, SPYS, TTP,Taliban members,ISI. Secure,encrypted,cloaked com channel set up 4 Uhttp://t.co/4EmrYuw #SaleemShahzad
Group Project #Pakistan Co D: http://t.co/yNwKRLL Counter propaganda, anti-corruption,Pro-Reporters,Pro-democratic Pakistan #SaleemShahzad
Welcome patroits:"S" wing members, ISI. Weary of killing Pakis?Encrypted,cloaked com channel set up 4 U http://t.co/4C17lms #SaleemShahzad
#Pakistan has gone 18 days without ISI killing a reporter, G #SaleemShahzad
WHO KILLED #SaleemShahzad inform: http://t.co/4C17lms
.
.
posted by gerald at
6/18/2011 01:53:00 PM
2 Comments
READ MORE
READ OR SUBSCRIBE, Our WAR OSINT on Twitter
Tweet
