Taliban to hit outposts enmass

Taliban to hit outposts en mass.

More combat outposts to be hit soon.

Recent attack on combat outpost lead to the

deaths of 8 Americans.

The base was scheduled to be shut down.

And has been cleared out early, its empty now.

Taliban are circulating the spin they drove

Americans out. Big morale boost.

Taliban have plans under way to hit more out

posts, simultaneously.

They believe they have found a weakness

in the system. Hit outposts 360 degrees,

with 4 to 5 times the troops they are

attacking,

The attack launches when the weather

is bad enough to prevent air support.

G

.

US big secret

Our BSU's

have picked up indications all US Intelligence agencys

are cuttting off contacts with all civilians. And tightening up data

exchange among themselves also. To keep it all secret and

avoid any leaks.

Paradigm Intel:

Big secret they are hiding, preparations for attack on Iran,

As always US Military are making plans for all contingencys.

They seem to be VERY serious about these plans.

Big "O's" last resort.

Gerald

Intelligence Anthropologist.

.

Colombia, noise and chatter

Colombia, weak noise and chatter out of

Santaf De Bogot

We have picked up something

about Colombia drug cartels or

terrorist buying up throw away

cell phones and a new web site

for them.

Connection to mojahden.net, BSU's have IPs.

BSU's, recon team deployed.

Gerald

Intelligence Anthropologist

.

Nuclear: Ops and Intel update; 10.10.09

Taliban gunmen take hostages at

Pakistan's military HQ, push

towards its nuclear arsenal

Source:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Report: Jihad Cell Arrested in Egypt in July 2009 Had Reached Advanced Stages of Building an Atomic Bomb

It was reported on September 29, 2009 that Egypt's Attorney General has completed the investigation of the 27 members of the Al-Takfir Al-Jihad cell, whose arrest was reported in July 2009 and who were suspected of being Al-Qaeda members and of planning terrorist operations.

Posted at: September 29, 2009

SOURCE:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has issued the Fatwa that the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons are forbidden under Islam and that Iran shall never acquire these weapons.

SOURCE:

NO SUCH FATWA FOUND, WE BELIEVE ITS JUST PROPAGANDA. G

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

On the Al-Falluja jihadi forum, a member said that he expects Al-Qaeda’s attack on Germany to be of a biological or nuclear nature.

LINK WITH HELD, G

WE SAW THIS BUT ITS JUST SPECULATION ON THE PART OF A FORUM MEMBER. G

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Online Jihadists Form Media Workgroup in Anticipation of Attacks in Germany

http://www.memrijttm.org/content/en/blog_personal.htm?id=2008&param=GJN

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXR

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2009/10/russia-to-enrich-irans-uranium.html

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Gerald

Intelligence Anthropologist

BSU's tracking.

..

Our surfers: 10.10.09

Our surfers: 10.10.09

Anthropologys war growth, changed paradigm

Hunting with locals for wild pig, supper.

Anthropology's war growth,

challenged paradigm.

By Gerald anthropologist Think Tank

This is a rebuttal to analysis of the use of anthropology in war.

Anthropology has a guilty conscience, the history of anthropology includes

involvement in genocide, supporting neocolonial politics and bad things.

This collective guilt memory of anthropologist triggers a strong

reactionary complex, not fully understanding how the brotherhood

could have gone so far wrong.

And a almost genetic fear of repeating the egregious error of their

fore fathers.

This fear seems to prevent them from acknowledging that evil

exists, and there is no moral imperative to protect evil.

The current general anthropological paradigm is in error

and erring on the side of over caution, as some mistaken

form of penance for anthropology's past deeds.

MY REBUTTAL IN CAPS FOR EASE OF READING.

GERALD

Dahr Jamail recent article on this site I have described HTS as comprising American scholars, primarily in the field of anthropology, along with sociologists and social psychologists, embedding themselves with the US military in the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.

FIGHTING AGAINST EVIL IS NOT AND DOES NOT COMPRISE AMERICAN SCHOLARS.

The US military would like the US public to believe it is a benevolent program, but it does not require a crystal ball to recognize the insidious reality. HTS teams actively engage in targeting the "enemy" in Iraq and Afghanistan. Team members often wear military uniforms and body armor, and even carry weapons. Like Ms. Roberts, they are not overly concerned about the fact that the "intelligence" they produce is instrumental in capturing and killing people.

NOT PEOPLE BUT TERRORISTS. FAILING TO MAKE THIS DISTINCTION IS IN EFFECT PUTTING BLINDERS ON ANTHROPOLOGISTS. AND TWISTING THE ANTHRO PARADIGM. ANTHROPOLOGY HAS NO OBLIGATION TO

PROTECT EVIL.

The social scientists who choose to employ themselves within HTS clearly are not having a moral struggle with the fact that they are allowing their knowledge to be used as a weapon of war.

GERMAN ANTHROPOLOGIST WORKED FOR THE NAZIS EVIL FINAL SOLUTION IN WWII.

ANTHROPOLOGIST WORKING AGAINST AL QAEDA IS AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROPOSITION.

THE CURRENT ANTHRO PARADIGM VIEWS ALL WAR AS EVIL, HENCE THEIR MORAL DILEMMA.

I HAVE NO RESERVATIONS ABOUT USING MY ANTHROPOLOGICAL SKILLS AGAINST AL QAEDA.

TO FIGHT EVIL IS THE MORAL THING TO DO.

The two highest ethical principles of anthropology are protection of the interests of studied populations, and their safety. All anthropological studies consequently are premised on the consent of the subject society. Clearly, the HTS anthropologists have thrown these ethical guidelines out the window.

THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS A BASTARDIZATION OF ANTHROPOLOGY WALLOWING IN GUILT.

THEY WOULD HAVE PROTECTED AND WORKED IN THE INTERESTS OF THE NAZIS?

WORKED FOR THE SAFETY OF THE NAZIS?

THEY ARE ADVOCATING WORKING TO PROTECT AL QAEDA.

THIS IS ACADEMIC DISHONESTY, AND SHOWS A LACK OF TRUST IN THE ANTHROPOLOGY

BROTHERHOOD TO DISTINGUISH GOOD FROM EVIL, OF COURSE ANTHROPOLOGY

WAS GUILTY OF WORKING FOR EVIL IN THE PAST.

THE BIG QUESTION IS HAS ANTHROPOLOGY GROWN ENOUGH NOW TO MAKE

AVOID THE SAME MISTAKES. THE CURRENT PARADIGM SOME ANTHROPOLOGIST

THINK NOT.

The mission of the Human Terrain social scientists gains legitimacy and credibility when expressed in terms of engineering the "trust of the indigenous population."

THIS IS MISLEADING PROPAGANDA, THE MISSION IS WINNING THE HEARTS AND MINDS WITH THE TRUTH,

EXPLAINING THE OTHER SIDE THROUGH WORD AND DEED. NOT LETTING THE TERRORIST LIES STAND UNCHALLENGED. GAINING TRUST THROUGH HONESTY AND TRUTH.

Price avers, "The problem with anthropology being used in counterinsurgency isn't just that anthropologists are helping the military to wear different cultural skins; the problem is that it finds anthropologists using bio power and basic infrastructure as bargaining chips to force occupied cultures to surrender."

AGAIN MORE BULL SHIT, AND THE WORDING EXPOSES THE LEFTEST AGENDA, WHICH HAS NO PLACE IN THE

ANTHRO PARADIGM. THERE IS NO FORCING AN OCCUPIED CULTURE TO SURRENDER.

THE GOAL IS TO EMPOWER THE CULTURE TO GROW VOID OF AL QAEDA'S TERRORISM BASED VIOLENCE.

THE LACK OF ACADEMIC HONESTY IN THAT STATEMENT IS APPALLING.

Although he says it is too soon to gauge [a] possible increase in HTS operations since Obama took office, Price is convinced that the president is falling for the claim that a smart counterinsurgency can lead not just to easier occupations, but to victory.

THE AUTHOR HERE IS EXPOSING HIS HIDDEN AGENDA, VICTORY IS

BRINGING ENOUGH TROOPS TO PROTECT THE POPULATION FROM THE TERRORIST

FOR THE INDIGENOUS TO BUILD A FORCE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AGAINST THE TERRORISTS.

THE AUTHORS DEFINITION SEEMS TO IMPLY SOME EVIL IN VICTORY. THE EVIL IS IN HIS OWN MIND.

VICTORY IS BUILDING THE LOCAL CULTURE TO STAND AGAINST

THE TERRORIST, ON THEIR OWN, AND SUPPORTING THEM TILL

THEY CAN.

For the military to find regionally competent anthropologists to work for them is unlikely. Price is convinced that, "most (American) anthropologists understand the obvious ethical problems in working for HTS. The real risk lies in the likelihood that anthropologists will be seduced by arguments to support soft-power projects tied to occupation and counterinsurgency - especially when these projects are increasingly being presented as "helping" the occupied.

THE ABOVE STATEMENT IS FILLED WITH FALSE ASSUMPTIONS, IT MAKES IT SOUND THAT WORKING

AGAINST EVIL IS BAD, LIKE THE ANTHROPOLOGIST ARE DUMMIES, NOT CAPABLE OF SPOTTING

ANY ETHICAL PROBLEMS AND WORKING THROUGH THEM USING THE ANTHROPOLOGICAL TOOLS

THEY USE EVERY DAY PROFESSIONALLY, THE AUTHOR IS STATING HIS LACK OF FAITH IN ANTHROPOLOGY

AND ANTHROPOLOGIST BASED ON HIS HISTORICAL GUILT, THEY MADE A MISTAKE IN THE PAST,

DON'T GIVE THEM ANOTHER CHANCE TO ERROR AGAIN.

WHILE I EXPECT ERRORS AND PROBLEMS WITH ANTHROPOLOGIST I HAVE THE UTMOST CONFIDENCE IN ANTHROPOLOGY.

As the new administration adopts less-violent manipulations of the environments and peoples in Iraq and Afghanistan, Price is concerned that anthropologists will fail to see the distinction between military coercion of occupied peoples and publicized acts of "humanitarianism."

I THINK EVEN THE MOST UNEDUCATED INDIGENOUS POPULATION CAN TELL THE DIFFERENCE

BETWEEN ACTS OF HUMANITARIANISM AND MILITARY COERCION, AND I HAVE THE CONFIDENCE

THAT ANTHROPOLOGIST WILL ALSO.

Corporate media coverage of the program conveniently does not indicate that HTS ignores basic anthropological principles of ethics, such as voluntary informed consent, issues of secrecy, and doing no harm, among others. Most anthropologists concur with Price that HTS is also part of a domestic propaganda project, "that tells the Americans that wars for the hearts and minds of the people of Iraq and Afghanistan can be won. History argues against any such outcome, but HTS becomes part of a lie to the American people that helps keep us fighting these already lost causes. It is so poorly designed that HTS has no hope of actually working as advertised, yet both the Bush and Obama administrations have sold us a false hope that such counterinsurgency programs can lead to an eventual victory."

ONCE AGAIN THE AUTHORS HAVE DELINEATED ANTHROPOLOGY TO THE VERY NARROWEST DEFINITION OF ANTHROPOLOGY. THAT OF ACADEMIC STUDY. THE WORK OF FIELD APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY HAS NO SUCH

NARROW DEFINITION. THERE IS NO OBLIGATION TO PROTECT EVIL, DEFEND EVIL, OR DO NO HARM TO EVIL.

USING THEIR DEFINITION THEY WOULD NOT STOP A NUCLEAR ATTACK ON USA USING ANTHROPOLOGY BECAUSE

IT MIGHT BE A VIOLATION OF ETHICS, OF FEAR OF DOING HARM TO AL QAEDA.

THE RANGE, SCOPE AND POWER OF ANTHROPOLOGY IS SUCH THAT IT CANNOT IGNORE ITS RESPONSIBILITY

TO ACT AGAINST EVIL, TO PROTECT THOSE WHO CANNOT PROTECT THEMSELVES, TO OPPOSE EVIL.

IT HAS AN OBLIGATION TO ACT NOT STAND ON THE SIDELINES HAND WRINGING OVER PAST ERRORS.

I am left to wonder how anthropologist Ann Dunham, Barack Obama's mother, would have reacted to her son's reliance on such clearly unethical anthropological means to achieve political ends so aligned with neocolonialist goals of occupation and subjugation?"

I THINK ANN DUNHAM WOULD BE VERY PROUD OF ANTHROPOLOGYS PLACE IN FACING OFF EVIL,

IN ENGAGING EVIL TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT AND FACING UP TO THE PROBLEMS OF THE PAST

AND GROWING BEYOND THEM.

THERE ARE NO GOALS OF NEOCOLONIALISM OR SUBJUGATION IN USA.

YOUR LEFTEST AGENDA IS SHOWING.

IF I CAN HELP PROTECT AFGHAN OR PAKI VILLAGERS FROM

SUBJUGATION BY THE TALIBAN OR AL QUADA BY LURING

EVIL AL QAEDA OR TALIBAN INTO A FIELD OF FIRE WHERE

THEY ARE KILLED BECAUSE I USED ANTHROPOLOGY I WILL DO SO,

EVIL...

KILLING THOSE THAT BOMB MARKET PLACES, MOSQUES,

KILLING WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND OTHER MUSLIMS,

BEHEADING AND USING SUICIDE BOMBERS IS CLEARLY

EVIL, AND I AM MEETING MY MORAL OBLIGATIONS BY

USING ALL MY SKILLS TO STOP THEM. THEY HAVE STATED

THEY WOULD USE A NUKE AGAINST AMERICA IF THEY COULD.

ANTHROPOLOGY HAS AN ETHICAL OBLIGATION TO MAKE THE

WORLD SAFER, BETTER, NOT JUST STUDY THE SLAUGHTER.

I KNOW WHERE MY MORAL OBLIGATIONS STAND AND

I AM CLEAR ABOUT MY ETHICS.

GERALD

ANTHROPOLOGIST

AD MAGNUM

.

Visit Dahr Jamail's website http://dahrjamailiraq.com

Google blog still not taking labels???

My paradigm shift.G

I've been contacted by a Defense Corporation.

And my Paradigm shifted.

I've learned the Government refers

to me as an " Intelligence Anthropologist".

( Not a "security anthropologist". )

Seems I've been wearing the wrong

hat for 8 years.

I started out studying the Internet,

hense the nomenclature,

"Internet Anthropologist".

And I've let the net guide me,

if your listening it talks.

I set up OSINT to listen to the

net.

And looked where my best fit would

be, most useful, most challenging.

I got into Anthropology by accident.

It wasn't my first choice.

But in a few years I could feel

the power and scope of anthropology.

My study of the Internet started

before there was an Internet, just

bulletin boards you could log on to

to access private data bases.

There were not even browsers

then.

So the Internet has molded me.

Every day is exciting, and as

it evolves exponentially I have

had to adjust my focus.

In the beginning I could pretty

well keep up with everything on

the WWW.

But soon noted the huge growth

in every direction.

And I had to make choices on what

to keep up with.

And those choices have lead me here,

to what I think is my highest and best use.

5 years ago I could not have predicted

the Internet would be HERE, or working

like it is and on.

I was able to predict the process,

and context.

Our best tools currently seem to be

technical and theoretical.

Tracking, tracing and peering into

closed cells.

The next 5 years look to be as

exciting and challenging as the

past 5 were.

They certainly look to be more

profitable.

Gerald

Intelligence Anthropologist

,

US Banks threaten GWOT

Citbank, BOA, AGI, Are the biggest offenders.

$2.7 Trillion dollars to the American Banks,

from the Bailout and from the Federal Reserve.

There is Criminal culpability for the Toxic

paper SCAM. Yes it was a scam.

Banks faking the credit

worthiness of the loanees, credit rating

agencys, falsifying AAA credit worthiness

for Paper they knew was toxic.

My auto mechanic had a side line

as a mortgage banker. WTF.

Nothing has changed, none of the

banking laws have changed.

No additional oversight.

No charges agsinst the Bank's CEO's.

Or against the rating agencys, who

gave the fraudently paper a AAA

rating.

The biggest robbery in HISTORY,

and the Robbers were given

$2.7 trillion dollars to cover their

losses.

The robbers the banks are not making

loans, even to each other.

Why?

Because the banks know all the banks

are carrying two sets of books.

The scam toxic paper the banks

got stuck with when the house

of cards came down maybe worth

38% of original value.

The scam paper msybe worth 38

cents for every dollar invested.

So the banks have no idea what

the credit worthiness is of each

other and don't want to lend

money to a bank with two sets

of books.

NO ONE KNOWS WHAT THE

REAL VALUE IS OF THESE

BANKS.

Their balance sheets are cooked.

These criminal banks almost brought

down the WORLDS economic system.

The USA HAD TO PUT TOGETHER

A BAIL OUT TO SAVE THE WORLD

ECONOMIC SYSTEM, AND SO

DID THE REST OF THE WORLDS

GOVERNMENTS HAVE TO PUT

TOGETHER BAIL OUTS TO PREVENT

A TOTAL BANKING COLLAPSE.

But it started in the USA.

Gee I wonder why the world is talking

about creating a new world currency

to replace the US dollar.

Its a lack of confidence in the US dollar

because of the lack of ANY INTERVENTION

to bring the criminal corporate banks

under control, or to charge them with

criminal activity.

The bank robbers were caught,

they were not charged,

the laws were left the same

so they could do it allover again.

And then they were rewarded

with $2.7 trillon dollar reward.

Look at that.

$2,700,000,000,000.00

And the Bank CEO's got bonuses

in the hundreds of millions of

dollars, paid for by the US tax payers

in bail out monies.

Paradigm Intel points to the

lobbyists.

The control they have over congress

and the criminals setting in congress.

What is the evidence for this hypothesis?

Congress allows them to legally operate

as LOAN SHARKS, 402% VIG.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2009/07/

loan-sharks-get-4400-vig-from-600-loan.html

30% VIG ON CREDIT CARDS.

In states where they have passed

laws against the Banking loan sharks,

Federal laws have exempted national

banks from prosecution.

Not only are these banks criminal,

the economic crisis they have caused

has had a devastating effect on the

purse strings of the GWOT.

Paradigm Intel is starting to point

to a cover up, as the Congress and

the Federal Reserve have approved

all actions and non-actions against

these criminal banks.

The Federal Reserve have claimed

the criminal banks are to BIG to fail.

The rest of that paradigm says

they are to BIG to prosecute or

bring under control, or regulate.

Glass Stegal act has not been re-instated

even though Paul Volker advises for it.

Our research indicates congressmen can be bought

for $1.5 million dollars, thats a starting point

for finding the criminal partners of the Banks

in congress.

The big question remains to be answered,

Can the US citizens take control of congress

away form the lobbyist?

This would seem to be prima ficia evidence

of criminal corruption and collusion between

banks and Congress.

The Banking criminal Mafia, continues to

threaten the world economy, Americas

place in the world and the GWOT.

Who is going to have the Intestinal fortutide

to bring them to justice and re-establish

America as a country of the people and for

the people , not for the Banking Mafia and

Lobbyist?

Gerald

Anthropologist

Series 7 & 13

.

http://biggovernment.com/2009/10/06/coburn-

senate-votes-to-prioritize-pork-over-national-defense/

Obama big mistake in Afghan?

The Real Trouble with Afghanistan and Obama

Underneath all this week's he-said/she-said over the war's future lies a self-inflicted wound: Our young president has lost sight of what matters in the military conflict that will define him, and lost sight of it to another Boomer-era vice president's guilty conscience.

By Thomas P.M. Barnett

But if the administration doesn't go along with the recommendations of its handpicked commander (and there were signs this afternoon that it was leaning away from the McChrystal plan and back toward Biden's strategy), then it will have effectively repudiated McChrystal's command with a highly publicized vote of no confidence. By extension, the White House will have completed its marginalization of McChrystal's boss, General David Petraeus. Which, given that the Iraq surge hero and Central Command chief has been urged to run for president in 2012, may be politically hard to resist for Obama's politically savvy advisors. But, again, the political savvy is getting the best of Team Obama when it comes to Afghanistan — this is a war, not an election, with many more lives at stake than a few of the best and brightest, and they'd be stupid to muddle or confuse the two.

And yet Obama will almost certainly seek to split his Big Afghanistan Decision down the middle (Talk big but act small!). That won't work, and not just because the world's bad boys will think of the American military as a bunch of high-tech pansies — because it wreaks of Obama speak for permanent downshifting in our long-term commitment to Afghanistan's future, which, by extension, makes everybody nervous about Pakistan's future.

And so, by shorting Afghanistan, the president may end up inadvertently declaring The Obama Doctrine: (1) yes, Iraq was a one-of-a-kind war, never to be repeated; and (2), in Clinton-era Colin Powell speak honed for the counterterrorism era, we go anywhere we want to kill anyone we want, but as far as the locals are concerned, they can simply fuck off.

In doing so, Obama will position himself internationally as both a full-blown wimp (Jimmy Carter much?) and a sanctimonious cynic (hellooooo, Bill Clinton!), confirming French president Nicolas Sarkozy's first impression that under that fabulous exterior lies a fabile young president.

Read more: http://www.esquire.com/the-side/war-room/obama-new-afghanistan-strategy-100809#ixzz0TNLQC6Nz

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Republican Senator John McCain disagrees, saying al Qaeda and the Taliban are one in the same.

"You can't separate the two. The Taliban is making gains. Al Qaeda will return if the Taliban takes over," he claims.

A hint from a top aide suggests how the president is leaning.

Most of those who attacked us on 9/11, the aide noted Tuesday, have moved out of Afghanistan. ( WTF? G )

SOURCE:

.

majahden.com gone underground

BSU's and paradigm Intel says

majahden.com gone underground.

To password protected site,

Banned spiders and search engine bots.

New URL being circulated by word of mouth.

Gerald

Anthropologist

Ops and Intel up date, 10.08.09

Ops and Intel up date, 10.08.09

Special Dispatch No. 2590
Hizbullah-Affiliated Businessman's Ponzi Scheme Causes Upheaval in Lebanon

Hizbullah-affiliated Shi'ite Lebanese businessman Salah 'Izz Al-Din, suspected of running a $2 billion Ponzi scheme, was arrested in Lebanon in early September 2009 after declaring bankruptcy.(2)

Several days after the scandal hit the headlines, the Lebanese daily Al-Safir reported that thousands of Lebanese and other nationals had lost money in 'Izz Al-Din's scheme, and that the investigation was being closely monitored by Lebanese parliament speaker Nabih Berri, Hizbullah secretary-general Hassan Nasrallah, and prominent Lebanese Shi'ite leader Ayatollah Muhammad Hussein Fadhlallah.(3) It was also reported that many senior Hizbullah officials had invested money with 'Izz Al-Din and suffered financial losses.(4) Fuad Al-Hashem, columnist for the Kuwaiti daily Al-Watan, claimed that the Hizbullah organization had likewise lost $683 million in investments with 'Izz Al-Din.(5)

In the aftermath of the scandal, numerous articles appeared in the Lebanese media criticizing Hizbullah and holding it responsible for the fraud, because of 'Izz Al-Din's affiliation with it. Hizbullah was blamed for encouraging the public to trust 'Izz Al-Din and to invest with him, and some even demanded that it compensate those who sustained losses.

To read excerpts from articles on the subject, visit http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD259009.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

WASHINGTON, Oct. 6 (UPI) -- A strong majority of U.S. residents say it is important to keep Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means taking military action, a poll indicates.

SOURCE:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Pakistan has forces,equipment for Taliban assault-US ( Paki giving advance notice so Talbi can move out, G )

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Russian soldiers ready to take on Blackwater

( NO COMBAT EXPERIENCE, g )

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Tehran accuses US in case of missing Iranian nuclear scientist‎ - 10 hours ago

DEBKAfile's Iranian sources report that Shahram Amid was a senior member of Tehran University's nuclear physics department which is directly involved in ...

( Paradigm intel says he defected, $1 million dollar cash bonus, G )

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

October 6, 2009

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) – U.S. Senator Tom Coburn, M.D. (R-OK) today released the following statement after the Senate rejected Coburn amendments that would have forced Congress to shift earmark funds back toward vital operations and maintenance. By a vote of 25 to 73, the Senate rejected an amendment offered by Dr. Coburn that would have restored to the troops $165 million earmarked within the Defense appropriations bill’s maintenance and operations accounts for congressional earmarks.

“In a time of war it is unconscionable for members of Congress to divert funds from vital operations to less-than-vital parochial pork projects. I regret the Senate voted today to protect their pet projects at the expense of our troops,” Dr. Coburn said.

SOURCE:

Gerald

.

How to spot terrorism.

How to spot terrorism.

The 8 signs

1-877-509-2422

Please repost on YOUR blog. G

...

Phone number to report terrorism Call: 1-877-509-2422

.

Some Playas are nervous.

Note the number of surfers to our site that

have Java turned off, 87%

Mypetjawa has only 2% java disabled.

I'm touched.

A tribute...

Thank YOU

Gerald

.

Surveillance up date: 10.06.09

Surveillance up date: 10.06.09

Odds and Ends:

We have spotted a new browser

in the wild that leaves, no tracks.

Nothing, except it does leave an

empty space where there should

be something. NSA?

That is the second invisible

browser we've seen in the past

6 mos. The first one leaves

an easily recognizable signature.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A Google Bot that isn't.

A bot that spends 29 min

and 13 seconds on TWO

pages?

It isn't a google bot, its

someone disguised as

a bot, this usually triggers

our security monitoring system

and a security team.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We have increased our

BSU's from a max of

100,000 to 129,000

bots. In anticipation of

future engagements.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The "Sunday" attack on Germany

threat by al Qaeda has drawn

intensive Internet Intelligence

ops from all over the world.

All the sites that carried the

threat have been taken down.

The message seems to be

you promote a threat and they

loose their site.

CNN's I-Reporter seemed to

have a very strange reaction to

the news about the attack.

Rather than reporting the threat

on the terrorist sites, they

deleted my post.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

We have several special ops

teams deployed, and recon teams

active and BSU's tracking.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Iranian Internet teams are very

active trying to pinpoint the

time and date of the attack on

their nukes and have some

antiquated cyber weapons

ready to be deployed.

Mostly for PR reasons

and to try an lul the regime

into thinking IT black hats

are on top of it, they aren't.

One of (sic) hackers

has even taken to wearing a

ACTUAL black hat.

LOL ROF.

when they move we will burn them.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Gerald

Tactical Internet Systems analyst

.

,