Cyber war = more US collateral dead

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

War just got a lot harder.

The speed the US Military can

adapt and change is genius cutting

edge paradigms.

The speed feels almost Geometric.

The next paradigm adaption increases

at higher rates each cycle.

Civil war was manual. Hand to hand.

1860s to 1940 WWII was the industrialization of warfare. Assembly line.

1945 to 1946? Japan was the nuclearization of war. Atom bomb.
1946 to 2000? Iraq is the technicalization of war.  Surgical strike weapons.
2000 to 2011 Afghan is almost the socialization of war. Anthropology
2010 to 2011Iran is the Cyberization of war. Stuxnet

The cyberization of war has set a new high mark for

a successful war.

US took out Iran's nuke capability without a death,

Stuxnet.

Of special note two of these paradigms were still ongoing

when they started the next paradigm.

Using the surgical strike paradigm, and started the 

anthropology paradigm, and while testing both of those

started and ran a new successful paradigm cyberdization or

War. Took out the nuclear objectives and without casualties.

And the US is proficient and experienced in them all.
The Iraq / Afghan war has been going on for twice
the length of WWII, and with a fraction of the deaths.

The last three paradigms have not been used in theater

in the same war, yet. 

We are going to see a new form of warfare.

The paradigm will be to take out targets without

any collateral damage. 

Leaders killed, Command and Control out,

Invisible surgical strikes against hardened

military targets. 

And no occupation and low expense.

The cyber option is by far the most economical,

cleanest and deniable.

Yup warfare just got a lot harder.

Note the cyber option doesn't work well

out side the gap. 

So is of limited use in Afghan.

There is an expectation of no collateral damage

during war, forming as we read.

Remarkable part is its blowback proof.

Hard to argue war with no collateral damage,

none zero.

And US troops are trained and experienced in

NOT bringing the full force of war against even 

the Taliban. US could raise the kill ratio 100 fold

if needed. But the Militarys feed back Lupe 

recognizes that as counter productive,

and they refrain from massive slaughter.

With no collateral damage the option of war

is a little easier to make.

Cyber option may increase the number of wars

while decreasing the deaths, to almost zero.

Very easy to become a bully with that kind of

power, and it won't be the Military making those

decisions, just following orders.

And a conglomeration of Democrats and Republicans

will be making those decisions. 

Some how thats just NOT reassuring.

And during a recession the Republicans voted in

a $700 billion tax break for Billionaires and voted

against unemployment benefits, DURING A RECESSION.

And a criminal Wall St Banking cartel controlling Congress.

This cyber option is going to be a problem.

As soon as they get comfortable with it.

The only effective counter move is kinetic sneak

attack against CONUS.
The only attack option open to them, and at US
softest target. Coast lines?

Which Iran could be planning now.

The cyber option could result in more American collateral

damage. From sneak kinetic attacks.

That should move our DHS and US coastal defense

paradigm towards a more focused threat.

Gerald

War Anthropologist.

Paki won't go after the Sanctuarys.

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Gen. Ashfaq Kayani isn't going after the Taliban 

and al qaeda sanctuaries in North Waziristan.

( former head of ISI, and head of Paki Military )

While Pakistan is a nuclear power they don't 

act like one, their actions more bespeak of

a 3rd world WWII armed nation.

Half their defense forces are on the border with

India, and fear to remove them. Worried like 

an old matron of an invasion from India.

And their pre-nuclear history speaks to their

reasons to fear India, their history with India

is problematic.

But they are a nuclear power, and still they

fear an attack form India, maybe a deficiency

in Military self esteem.

Fly over N Waziristan

So Paki uses India as an excuse not to go after

the bad guys in North Waziristan. 

But even that maybe just a cover.

They view part of the Taliban as Paki shock

troops, to be used for adventurism in Afghan

or undercover troops in covert battles with 

India.

And Paki saw what US did after helping Afghan

defeat the Russians, US abandoned Afghan,

and the war lords and drug lords took power.

The Taliban with the help of Paki swept in

and took over from the Drug lords and War 

lords.

Paki fears US may do it again, just abandon Afghan.

Hell Karzi has spoke of going over to the Taliban

side. Afghan even with US as a partner isn't all

that stable.

If US just dumps Afghan again then Paki has

do deal with the after math.

And who wants to rely on American Congressmen?

I suppose they could Buy the Republicans off like

the Wall St Banks do.

But thats expensive even if the Supreme Court

opened the door for them to do so.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Supreme Court sells out America

So Gen. Ashfaq Kayani sees the Taliban

in Paki as providing some control

over what happens after US leaves Afghan.

The tactical ability to tamp down any war lords

or drug lords causing problems for Paki.

So the US struggles with its past actions

and short sightedness in its recent history,

and searches for a way to deal with past

bad decisions.

If he takes out the Taliban then he is left with

his flank left open, and cross border incursions

against the Paki Government.

If he leaves the Taliban alone in N Waziristan

then the US is left to deal with cross border 

incursions into Afghan.

He views his best tactical decision as leaving

the Taliban and al qaeda in tact for use after

the US leaves Afghan.

His decision leaves a sanctuary for the Insurgents

in Paki for incursions and supplying the insurgency

in Afghan. US has grown tired of these sanctuaries

and have recently been targeting insurgents in

N Wazirstan with drones, leaving Paki to its

objections.

SOURCED FROM.

The paradigm is fairly clear and no easy solution

presents its self.

One side view the Taliban as hosts for the real

Enemy al Qaeda and the other side view them

as auxiliary forces for emergency deployment.

Every time a drone kills key insurgents, they

will pressure and threaten Paki General Kayani to

stop the drone attacks, expect escalating protests

to killing terrorist leadership in N Waziristan.

Karzi wants to adopt the Taliban and Kayani

wants to employ them.

And US would like to kill them or force

them to hand over al qaeda.

The problem seems to be how to get

all; Afghan, Paki, Taliban to want to hand

over al qaeda or execute them.

A minimum win, for all maybe.

Of what use is the al qaeda cult to

Afghan or Paki?

al qaeda cult does directly connect both

Afghan and Paki to the US multi-billion dollar anti-

terrorism Teat.

Our paradigm Intel on what happens when US does leave.

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/12/paradigm-intel-after-withdrawal.html

A solution: Honorable Win, and gets the Terrorist.6 mos.

Gerald

War Anthropologist.

.

Anonymous on the ropes

This blog set to diaplay 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Prologue:

Anonymous has no idea of the shit storm headed their way.
Our "paradigm engine" and BSU's picked up the intel.
This paradigm intelligence is predicated on those findings.
The last time Anonymous went up against the Gov. was
that "Scientology" incident, that was pre- 911, and pre-cyber
armed US Intelligence forces were even in existence.
They have server logs from 3 seized servers. and they
are playing with the guys that did "Stuxnet" NSA.
( I think anyway, G  Paradigm Intel on NSA )
and the FBI with their new invisible
all encompassing real time surveillance cocoon. And using
CIA connections overseas. And operating under the new
"sharing" guide lines.
The only question remaining is what the US DOJ wants to
do, issue warrants for everyone that fired up a cannon?
A RIAA type mass court attack?
Or maybe just take out the brains, biggest activists, best hacker,
few sub leaders, just read the emails or IRC logs you can see who is who.
Or maybe take out some of the prime top cadre of the Org.
Maybe some up and down the line.
We have had no hand in this, its just our paradigm intel,
and a heads up for those that will listen, I do request they
not "light up" jester as a humanitarian gesture, it would put
his life at risk from the anti-terrorism work.

Good Luck Guys
G

The Post

Wikileaks and Anonymous current cyber war is doomed.

It is not a fight for free speech,

They are not publishing material wrong doings,

they are publishing everything, just to violate privacy.

This act against WWW privacy will have deep and

long reaching effects on Anonymous and Wilileaks.

Very negative impacts.

Former Anon member critique.

Wikileaks and Anonymous fight against privacy is EVIL.

WRONG.

Wikileaks primary motive seems to be profit $$$, 

just like the Wall St Banks, without morals.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Wikileaks defrauding donors

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: wikileaks FRAUD

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Proof Wikileaks Deception

Anonymous has a key core cadre of hackers and administrators.

They are at risk in this fight, because their cause is BAD.

Even Gov.s have a right to privacy, now I'm not talking about

releasing reports on US wrong doing, that they might be able

to get away with. But releasing EVERYTHING just cause its

private or "Secret" is going to cause a huge backwash.

And both groups will find it very expensive.

You don't take a willow switch to a sleeping Lion.
Posting wrong doings is one thing,
posting everything just because its private (Secret) is
quite another.

If their paradigm was solid then public support might

protect them to some extent, but they are just violating 

privacy, a very big NO NO on the WWW.

Trying to out Jester a known cyber terrorist warrior

would put him at risk and another major violation

of the WWW paradigm.

These organizations just don't respect any ones privacy. 

And they are trying to hide under the Freedom of press

Shield, Julian will pay the price.

How much of Anonymous is left after may put them

in jeopardy. I think there is a function in society for

the Anonymous Group, but the Internet paradigm finds

their stand against privacy offensive.

Anonymous Servers seized in Texas, Germany and Canada.

I am just one in thousands. I am part of Legion. I am Anonymous…. Uhm…. Mommy, why is there a big black van parked in front of the house

And the public tide is turning against them.

And the Law and Intelligence agencys of many

countries have them in their sites.

HOW TO PREPARE FOR A 
FBI RAID AT YOUR HOME.

This will not turn out well for Anonymous,

I hope their core can withstand the assault.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Wikileaks, Anonymous burning members leaky Ion Cannons , 

Privacy is a call to action on the WWW.

Wikileaks ignores this at its own peril.

Wikileaks Rest In Peace:
http://cryptome.org/0003/wikileaks-rip.htm

Gerald

War Anthropologist
Disclosure: We have worked with Anonymous on other
operations, we hope they will survive.

Used Anonymous Low Orbit Ion Cannon:
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Wikileaks, 
Anonymous burning members W/ low orbit Ion cannon  it LEAKS  IPs...

Suckered by Anonymous. Poor kid.

.

UPDATE:

Geraldanthro GeraldAnthro 

Noise chatter: #Wikileaks being investigated for embezzlement. $1.2 million went where? Mannings got ZERO $, despite wikileaks promises,  Around $600,000 missing,

One very bad sign is "Smoking Gun" did NOT carry the full indictment.

And if you get busted Anonymous can't help, you will be shunned, cut off as a matter of opsec,
you pay your own legal bills, maybe Mom and Dad will? G
.

UPDATE: 02.01.10

Anonymous dosing Britains Gov.
Our BSU's indicate one of the Targets is Scotland Yard.
This is a suicide mission for anonymous.
Paradigm intel forecasts hundreds more arrests.
They brought a knife to a gun fight.
We are only observing.
G

.

update 02.08.11

Anonymous has stepped up their game, doing

some real hacking.Went after a security group 

stalking them hunting IPs and IDs.

Firm stalking #anonymous hacked by anon, #anonymous hacks computer security firm - http://goo.gl/news/kjy3 This is real hacking not DDos, G


Prelude to a small cyber war?


.

Anonymous ( @AnonymousIRC) just released a 

decompiled version of stuxnet.

His helpers:

DCoderLT (author)
Laurelai (committer)

The question is Why?

This is related to "Operation Payback"

Does Anonymous have a suicide wish?

Death wish?

"Now that pieces of that code become available, 

it's not a far step to others developing their own 

attack kits, Gregg told FoxNews.com.

Is Anonymous trying to make the code available

to bring down crucial aspects of US infrastructure?
That may be considered and act of WAR.
Anonymous maybe inviting Black Wet operations
against them, the guys they are tempting don't play nice. 
Just a strong heads up, but get it out of your ass.
I really don't want to see any of you dead, by accident
or other wise. 
Where is the supervision?

Would Anonymous go NUCLEAR?

Bin Laden loosing on all fronts

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

Bin Laden, cult leader: With edema

The next 911 on the calendar is the 10th anniversary of the event.

And in passing represent some significant milestones.

The job the CIA, FBI and NSA and many others has been

outstanding. But after this is over will we regret the loss of privacy?

What we gain in security we lost in privacy.

The hardest threat to defend against is the Lone Wolf.

And they have been very good at picking up some of

the Lone Wolfs before any damage.

Someone listening to the News spin goes to

the Internet and gets caught up in some terror

site or forum or video on YouTube and gets him

started. Someone acting alone, plans an attack.

And the FBI is inside, and makes an arrest.

Thats very remarkable, and exactly what the

public wants.  I've faulted the FBI before for

being too bricks and mortar oriented and not

more cyber surveillance oriented. And in this

case seems to stand them in good stead.

Stuxnet puts NSA on the cutting edge of cyber

domain, ( If they made it G). And points out

just how vulnerable the world is to cyber WMDs.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Stuxnet 3.0 most powerful ...

The anniversary also points to 10 yrs of

al Qaeda cult failures, and I would expect

an all out effort by Binny to pull something off.

The split between al qaeda and its cyber

arm remains split, they don't release vids

on 'its'sites, lack of trust.

The "Official sites" are second rate proxies,

trying to reflect /mimic terrorist policy. 

Its a matter of setting up a 'Brand' site

then waiting to see if al qaeda cult recognizes

you. Very similar to setting up an al qaeda franchise

in another country, and waiting for the recognition

from the cult, but very little real connection.

But they run semi successful info war and propaganda 

sites tuned to recruiting  Poisoned "imitation Muslim" 

authorities targeting lone wolfs.

Binny has been bastardizing Islam for 10 yrs now.
Al qaeda failed

Their measure of success is a lone wolf attack

every two to three months. Out of a possible

demographic audience of millions.  

While their measure of success is set at a

very low threshold, every couple of months,

its the most difficult type of threat to intercept,

the "Lone Wolf".

But many wana be terror sites post propaganda,

links to YouTube videos and violence inciting 

speeches. Twisting the heads of wana be lone wolfs.

Children getting the Keys to Heaven?

Though the record speaks to a seemingly well balanced 

paradigm. The majority have been caught.

But the cult only needs one to get through to

trigger a terrorist response. "Terrorism".

Wana bees often are people with low self-esteem who turn to
religious extremism after experiencing a crisis.

That makes them ripe for savvy agents to exploit.

But there is terrorism and TERRORISM, 

Olde Binny keeps lowering his goals, setting

his sites lower. From 911 commercial jets

as bombs to fire crackers in NY.

This alone points to the success against the

GWOT.

So even if Binny gets a hit in before the next

911, he still hasn't won, 

Cult Epic Fail.

Gerald

Anthropologist

.

What is IATT?

This blog set to display 20 days of posts. Sorry Blogspot only shows 3 days, waiting for a Google fix, G

What is IATT?

Civilian counter terrorism force.

What is our mission at IATT?
They center around 4 paradigms.
#1) Info War getting the Truth out.
#2) Collecting and Reporting actionable Intel
#3) Policy change.
#4) Limited defensive cyber warfare.
We have been changing, re-inventing
ourselves every couple of years.
As needed. Our Mission:

Our operations deal with three paradigms:

Your equipment war tools are obsolete.

Your being commanded by bad leaders.

Your human rights are being suppressed.

In this venue we hope to avoid interference

with any Military operations.

We also offer 24 hr kill notices for sensitive data.

Gov is offered 24 hrs in which they can kill our post/

information.

Its only happened a couple of times they asked

for data/intel NOT to be published.

And we assert the right of self defense on the WWW.

And stand ready to enforce it.

So how does Anthropology fit into all this?

Observation, synthesis and action are the essence of applied Anthropology.

There is a open field in the study of Internet anthropology and its uses in the GWOT.

Where is the Anthropology?

I started out as an Internet Anthropologist studying

the culture and Tribes, so to speak on the WWW.

There is a classification of "Security Anthropologist" but the work I do is a little different,
it is Internet Anthropology.

And its application to the GWOT I'm calling

"War Anthropologist".

HQ functions of IATT

 Our Record? Not Bad.

Two of our public best.

TALIBAN WEBMASTERS AND HACKERS. IPs

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Exclusive:Al Qaeda knew, 341 ...

Kudos from Feds:

The Team.

And you can read our OSINT here:
READ OR SUBSCRIBE, Our "WAR OSINT" on Twitter

Ode to Company "C" by one of its members.

Hope this helps in understanding IATT.

Join Company "C"

Gerald

War Anthropologist

.