Moscow Elected American President
This maybe the most
important POST of my Career.
This is My Complaint of Election Fraud
submitted to Federal Election Commission (FEC),Office of Inspector General
Lynne A. McFarland,Inspector General
By Email email@example.com 11.19.2016; 2:44 pm EST
Putin has Motive, Ability & Opportunity to Elect Trump.
This article isn't about trump,
its about Putin, & how he could Steal an American Election.
Its clear Russia hacked Democratic National Committee & stole Emails.
17 US Intelligence Agencies have confirmed this.
And released Emails to Russian Puppet Wikileaks.
( Wikileaks had Leaks from Russian protesters & refused to release them)
CNN published nonsense about Election sites being Secu
Faulty Paradigm and Amature comprehension of Methods.
Rigging Election is very doable.
One doesn't hack Voting Machines
one hacks Computers the votes are reported to.
Changing the results from 2 or 3 States gives Trump a win.
Its documented Russians can evade Malware Detection.
And documented they compromised Several State Election sites.
This is not a surprise,
The statements about Election sites being to diverse & hence safe
is nonsense. One doesn't have to hack all Election sites or
voting Machines to Steal an Election, Just a few states reporting
falsified data could swing election to Trump.
Feds have admitted Russians have hacked
Pentagon, White House, Sect of State & Joint Chiefs of staff.
State Election sites are NOT as well protected as those sites.
We have confirmation Putin's hackers evading Computer Security
and evidence they penetrated three State Election sites
and have hacked heavily protected Federal Intelligence Sites.
AND hacked DNC stealing Emails.
Many ways, methods to BackDoor a network.
PoisonTap - exploiting locked machines w/Raspberry Pi Zero State Election Computer Nets NOT SECURE
Russian Stuxnet Clone.
Russians have hacked hacked heavily protected Federal Intelligence Sites,
State election sites would not be a Problem.
How can we Know if Russia Stole an American Election?;
FAST and Cheap;
A full manual recount of the paper records would be definitive, but that’s unnecessarily difficult, expensive and time-consuming if the results are actually right.
There’s an easier way: an audit that manually examines a random sample of the ballots in a way that has a large chance of detecting and correcting incorrect results. This is called a “risk-limiting” audit. If the reported winner of a contest really won, a risk-limiting audit generally needs to examine only a small fraction of the ballots. But if the reported winner actually lost, a risk-limiting audit has a large chance of indicating that a full hand count is needed to set the record straight.
Risk-limiting audits are a crucial check on election integrity and accuracy even when elections are not controversial and margins are wide. They have been endorsed by the Presidential Commission on Election Administration and many organizations concerned with election integrity. Colorado law requires risk-limiting audits starting in 2017, and California law requires them
If necessary a Forensics Teams check of State Election Networks
Math Increasingly Suggests Election Fraud Against Hillary Clinton
Demand An Audit Of The 2016 Presidential Election
Dec 19th Electoral College cast official votes for Pres voice your concerns directly to them. Click to Email Them,Click this Link http://asktheelectors.org/#_=_
Russian Cyber Strike beheads US Gov capitulates