By Gerald, Internet Anthropologist Think Tank 09.03.09
Paradigm Intel forecast:
Iran makes some small gestures,
and acknowledges a willingness to talk
as a method to stall for more time .
Expect more desultory responses.
Their goal is to stall for enough time
to test a nuclear devise.
There is a propensity for both sides
to move towards some small accommodation
to avoid a confrontation. And voice some
"progress" towards a non-nuclear armed Iran.
While USA is functioning in earnest, Iran
is not acting in good faith, they are just
stalling for time.
Sanctions had no impact on N Korea's
drive to obtain a nuke weapon.
In fact N Korea even signed an
agreement and then ignored it
and tested two nukes.
N. Korea and Iran view sanctions
as the price to join the nuke club.
Sanctions have had and will have
no impact no impact on Iran's
goal to get a nuke.
Iran views their objective for a nuke
with religious fervor, ( the 13 Imman )
and as an opportunity to take their
place as a world nuclear power.
And use the nuclear weapons as an
umbrella to protect their terrorist activities.
Iran views USA as a paper tiger,
they seized the American Embassy
and took hostages, held them for 444
days and USA did not retaliate or take
actions.
Obama's overtures towards dialog
have been viewed as weakness by the
Iranian Regime.
And view Obama's actions as a desire
to be viewed as a good guy, and the regime
doesn't believe Obma will give that up for
an attack on Iran's nuke stockpile.
Iran views Israel as a real threat.
They have acted and took out Iraq's
reactor and Syria's reactor.
The world is fast approaching
a time to decide if Iran will be allowed
to get Nuclear weapons.
There are many questions to be answered
in order to resolve the paradigm.
Does Obama have the BALLS to take
Military action against Iran?
Can USA hold Israel in check?
Will Israel defend its self with a
preemptive strike?
Can Iran stall long enough to test
a Nuke?
Iran will not voluntary give up its
pursuit of a Nuke weapon.
The decision will be Obama's.
To allow Iran to get a nuke
or take action to stop them.
Will his legacy be a nuclear
armed Iran?
If Iran gets a nuke they
will use it.
Can this problem be managed? YES G
What will Iran do with a Nuke?
Does Obama have the courage to stop Iran?
Gerald
Anthropologist
Does that sound like they are looking for peace? G
Update: Great piece by Annie Hamilton
Strange as it may sound, President Ahmadinejad swears that a halo of light appeared around him while he addressed the UN in '05, confirming his "divine purpose on Earth " Ahmadinejad’s is also obsessed with the return of Shiite Muslims’ messiah and as a stringent follower of Islam, has expressed his ultimate goal of the destruction of America and Israel on more than one occasion. Iran’s “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Ali Khameini declared that Iran refuses to “beg world powers for its right to develop nuclear technology” and has demonstrated that it will not retreat from the "field of danger" and will protect those rights, even should it mean death for them. Ahmadinejad reportedly spoke with Syrian president Bashar Assad recently, where (if sources are citing truthful statements) Assad is reportedly hoping for a united war as it will only strengthen their 'position.'
Deadline or not, this hardly portrays a positive outlook for our safety in America, our Administration or for hope for peace in the middle east. The $800 million dollar question remains: How will our Administration react to this deadly threat against Israel and America?
SOURCE:
.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home