Cyber force of will?

I've read many articles about why the terrorist sites
can't be taken down.

About the rampant cyber crime, $100 M a year from
Banks..

About Malware hacker attacks, and only about "defending"
against them.

About 100,000 probes an hour on DOD nets.

Its hard to control a domain if your 100% defensive.

It looks like the Cyber Domain is not dominated
by the US Military, like the Air Force dominates
air space, when it desires.

It looks like the many terrorist sites that remain up
as command and control for insurgents is beyond
the power of the new Cyber Command.

The Terrorist web sites are the gardens for home
grown terrorists.

WHAT HAVE THEY DONE?

Brian Michael Jenkins at RAND:

And the new US Cyber command are mounting very
strong defenses against them IF they attack.

But even during War time the terrorist sites seem enjoy
a certain impunity from the US Cyber Command,
But maybe their mission isn't to dominate Cyber
Space ? Maybe their mandate is only to defend?
( But then who is responsible for dominating Cyber Space,
during a time of War? )

They should be renamed, "US Cyber defense Command"

All the Terrorist sites can be taken down if there is the WILL.



Gerald

IS COLLECTING INTEL MORE IMPORTANT
THAN STOPPING ATTACKS?


COUNTER POINT Anyone? PLEASE..
How have I got this wrong?
.