IATT, FBI, 60 min,McAfee RIGHT.

IATT, FBI, 60 min,McAfee RIGHT.

By Gerald Internet Anthropologist Think Tank

Our Paradigm Intel has been heard.

We have been broadcasting the risk of a Cyber Pearl harbor

for about 2 years now.

INTERNET ANTHROPOLOGIST THINK TANK:

CYBERWARS'S PEARL HARBOUR

Aug 1, 2007

Others are coming around.

McAfee warns of cyber risk:

McAfee says, "There have been increasing reports of cyber attacks and network infiltrations that appear to be linked to nation-states and political goals." The worries can prompt threatened nations, like Israel, to prepare defensive and offensive cyber weapons, leading to what the information security giant says can be a "cyber arms race". McAfee says that the private sector is at even greater risk, and that governments should prepare for cyber warfare.

Their Full report here.

FBI Cyber Division Report

Ominous.

NEFA pdf ( Can't copy any text, once again NEFA makes their

reports nearly usless. G )

60 Min has good report here.

What does a Cyber raid look like?

Cyber Data Raid ( IATT )

What would all out cyber war look like?

USA leads in Cyber War Universe.

But could a surprise attack take out

USA's offensive counterattack?

Some of the data raids present their

own unique problems.

12 terabytes of data has been downloaded

in 2007 from the State Dept, DOD, Dept of

Commerce, Dept of Energy, NSA , etc.

As a student I used to back up my Universitys computer

systems, 7 terabytes, and that took 8 hours.

8 hours of automated computers copying data at close

to the speed of light.

12 terabytes is about the size of the Library

of Congress.

( And the USA doesn't know what Government did it.

The answer to who the thief is, may lie in its size.

How do you exploit a data base the size of the

Library of Congress, as the data is hot and current

processing in a timely manner is of utmost importance.

What government has enough cleared/vetted troops

that read Eng lish to try and exploit the data in a timely manner?

Who had massive outlays of cash for IT in that

time frame, or what government dumped a huge

IT project , to focus on this data base around that

time. Its going to take considerable resources to

keep and use this Elephant. G )

What do you do with a data base the size of the

Library of Congress in a foreign language.

Globalization is addicted to the Internet, it makes

everything so easy, fast and comprehensive its

indispensable.

And the old MAD paradigm is fully in operation

with other state actors, Mutually assured destruction.

In case of cyber attack, unless they think they think

its possible to take out YOUR internet.

And you can't ask NSA to make the web safe.

Its counterproductive for NSA.

So the paradigm allows for others to look at your cards,

but not burn down the club house.

Terrorist and suicidal states ( Iran ) love

the MAD paradigm, Mutual Destruction

is a goal for some of them.

On the Internet its the 1700's there ain't NO SHERIFF.

JUST SOME VERY LARGE RANCHES.

Short term the Internet not gona die,

long term the prognosis could be terminal.

Its serious and getting worse.

The context needs to change to Safty

first, functionality second.

And it needs a Sheriff with a big stick.

And right now only America has a big

cyber stick.

Gerald

Internet Anthropolomgist, ad Magum

Tactical Internet Systems analyst

.