Taliban vs US Military 10 yrs.
How is the Taliban and al qaeda standing up to
out than the US is at getting its version out.
They typically produce battle vids with causalities
10 to 100 times actual damages.
And vids and allegations on the Internet 15 min
to 30 min after the battle.
Sometimes the US doesn't respond for a month
to Taliban allegations.
And for that month the Taliban allegations stand
without the truth.
But does Info War work?
Well its all about winning the hearts and minds.
And the Taliban and al Qaeda seem to be having
some success with it, standing up to the most
powerful military the world has ever seen with
just a few farmers and business men and Imams.
And WWII grade weapons. No Armour, no air force,
etc.
Leaving the Taliban and insurgent web sites
up may lead to intelligence collection but
it also leads to never ending file of recruits
and independent, spontaneous attacks in
the US.
US is allowing insurgent recruiting by
tacit approval, leaving the web sites up.
You are collecting Intel on insurgent operations
you have enabled by leaving the insurgent web
sites up.
the most powerful Army ever in the history of the
world? For 10 years?
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An Army general has summed up the military challenge in Afghanistan: "We can't kill our way out of this thing."
Maj. Gen. John Campbell commands Regional Command East (R.C. East) along the border with Pakistan, an insurgent heartland and one of the hottest areas in Afghanistan. As the general said at a Wednesday press conference, the environment in R.C. East is, using the contemporary vernacular, "very, very kinetic. If you go up into Kunar [province], up into the Pech River Valley, they're fighting every single day up there ... very, very kinetic to this day."
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Why can't the US kill the enemy?
Why can't they kill their way out of Afghan
insurgency?
How have they been able to get recruits
to replace the dead for 10 years?
Where do they get the recruits?
What paradigm are they using ?
INFO WAR.
VOA has gotten on board, in a big way, recently.
the insurgents Producing a steady stream of
propaganda and lies thru Media,
Mosques, madrassas, Radio,
night letters, TV and the Internet.
The insurgents are better at getting their versionout than the US is at getting its version out.
They typically produce battle vids with causalities
10 to 100 times actual damages.
And vids and allegations on the Internet 15 min
to 30 min after the battle.
Sometimes the US doesn't respond for a month
to Taliban allegations.
And for that month the Taliban allegations stand
without the truth.
They don't lose battles they have martyrs..
And claim the martyrs as a victory
And claim the martyrs as a victory
They blame the CIA for the civilians they
kill, and even though 72% don't like the
Taliban they continue to get recruits.
And they put out their propaganda in
all of the indigenous languages.
Ahmed Quraishi is a good example
of propaganda arm. Blatant lies. opinions
presented as facts, and misstatement and
misleading headlines. And lack of sources.
I've signed up 3 times to post on the site
and each time my registration has been
deleted.
If the US can disconnect this propaganda
machine they can interrupt the flow of recruits.
But does Info War work?
Well its all about winning the hearts and minds.
And the Taliban and al Qaeda seem to be having
some success with it, standing up to the most
powerful military the world has ever seen with
just a few farmers and business men and Imams.
And WWII grade weapons. No Armour, no air force,
etc.
Leaving the Taliban and insurgent web sites
up may lead to intelligence collection but
it also leads to never ending file of recruits
and independent, spontaneous attacks in
the US.
tacit approval, leaving the web sites up.
you have enabled by leaving the insurgent web
sites up.
If we at Internet Anthropologist can take sites
down than so can the Intelligence community.
The insurgent sites are up with the tacit approval
of US intelligence agencys.
Make up your minds, stop the half measures.
Interdicting attacks looks good in the press,
but wouldn't it be better to cut down the attacks?
Gerald
Internet Anthropologist
The Military has a doctrine for this, "Over whelming force"
In this case it should be a paradigm of "Over Whelming
Info"
Truly Shock and awe (technically known as rapid dominance)
in the Info WAR.
.
In this case it should be a paradigm of "Over Whelming
Info"
Truly Shock and awe (technically known as rapid dominance)
in the Info WAR.
.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home