Spank or Kill
Spank or Kill
Ban paddling but OK to execute.
Congresswoman wants to ban paddling.
Its legal in 22 states.
There has been no study to see
what effects paddling has had
in the 22 states.
Teenagers demeanor today
is so gentile and well mannered.
"F**K you."
The tin hats argue that
corporal punishment imbues
violence in children.
I argue the opposite,
it imbues respect.
My generation understood
physical punishment, Dad
used the belt, the nuns
use a ruler.
While I don't support
the use of a belt, I
had an understanding
of consequences for
my actions.
Today there is no consequences
for kids actions till they
reach the age of majority
and are jailed.
Only Gangs exercise
any control over the
kids and that thru
corporal punishment
beat ins.
The gangs have a better
understanding of child psychology
and what it takes to control them
than Congress, while I'm not
supporting Beat ins, as a method
of corporal punishment for some
kids exceptions could be made.
The lack of corporal punishment
leads to violence, bullies
and gang membership.
Some kids view the Gangs
as families. Which is sad.
While the congresswoman
decrys paddling they approve
of execution of the very same
children for capital crimes.
That strikes me as a cultural
sickness,
Paddling NO
Execution YES.
There is a measured middle
ground, where there
is attached a consequences for
teenagers actions, some thing
less than a belt, before they
get to the execution stage.
The current paradigm sets
up the kids for immoral
punishment because
they have had no responsibility
attached to their actions,
no corporal punishment,
and when they do go around
the bend, the Sate legally
murders them.
Tries them as adults and
executes them.
An uneasy American
cultural sadistic tradition.
Gerald
Internet Anthropologist
.
Ban paddling but OK to execute.
Congresswoman wants to ban paddling.
Its legal in 22 states.
There has been no study to see
what effects paddling has had
in the 22 states.
Teenagers demeanor today
is so gentile and well mannered.
"F**K you."
The tin hats argue that
corporal punishment imbues
violence in children.
I argue the opposite,
it imbues respect.
My generation understood
physical punishment, Dad
used the belt, the nuns
use a ruler.
While I don't support
the use of a belt, I
had an understanding
of consequences for
my actions.
Today there is no consequences
for kids actions till they
reach the age of majority
and are jailed.
Only Gangs exercise
any control over the
kids and that thru
corporal punishment
beat ins.
The gangs have a better
understanding of child psychology
and what it takes to control them
than Congress, while I'm not
supporting Beat ins, as a method
of corporal punishment for some
kids exceptions could be made.
The lack of corporal punishment
leads to violence, bullies
and gang membership.
Some kids view the Gangs
as families. Which is sad.
While the congresswoman
decrys paddling they approve
of execution of the very same
children for capital crimes.
That strikes me as a cultural
sickness,
Paddling NO
Execution YES.
There is a measured middle
ground, where there
is attached a consequences for
teenagers actions, some thing
less than a belt, before they
get to the execution stage.
The current paradigm sets
up the kids for immoral
punishment because
they have had no responsibility
attached to their actions,
no corporal punishment,
and when they do go around
the bend, the Sate legally
murders them.
Tries them as adults and
executes them.
An uneasy American
cultural sadistic tradition.
Gerald
Internet Anthropologist
.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home