Obama's Afghan decision:
Obama's Afghan decision:
By Gerald Internet Anthropologist Think Tank
And that is exactly what Obama is doing now.
It would seem Obama is having experts look
at exactly those concerns.
And is even waiting till the Afghan election
runoff is done to decide fully on the next step.
USA did abandon Afghan after their fight with the occupying Russians.
And the Taliban took over giving cover to al
Qaeda for the 911 attack.
I think a replay of that strategy is a bad idea.
Army doctrine on the Afgan War. CIA is running
counter Terrorism operation while the Army is moving to a counter insurgency effort.
Resulting in todays NYT lead story,
Brother of Afghan Leader Said to Be Paid by C.I.A.
The story has US Armys fingerprints all over it.
"General" says....
Seems the conflict between the CIA and Army is
coming into the open.
Army want 40,000 more troops to win hearts and minds ( counter insurgency ).
CIA doesn't need that to just kill Taliban, ( counter terrorism )
Question becomes how USA stays.
ARTICLE: Pakistan's Pashtuns, looking for statehood, may look to Taliban, Christian Science Monitor, October 4, 2009
I don't think this pathway is bizarre in the least. As I've said earlier, I think some sort of soft border that allows for a Pashtun state is inevitable. The Durand Line is unsustainable because it's completely arbitrary.
If this is how we coop the Taliban, then I think we have a real chance.
Posted by Thomas P.M. Barnett on October 27, 2009 5:38 AM | Permalink
Labels: durand line, Pashtun people, War in Afghanistan
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home