Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Global Counterterrorism Cyber Network, not

  • Search our BLOG


  • HOME
    Terrorist Names SEARCH:
    Loading

    Saturday, October 25, 2008

    Global Counterterrorism Cyber Network, not

    Photo by Gerald; CR 2008


    Read both these two stories together,
    its why we need a Global Counterterrorism Cyber Network.
    By Gerald, Internet Anthropologist Tank Tank
    Oct 25, 08

    Building a Global Counterterrorism Network

    By Michael Jacobson

    This afternoon, as part of a Washington Institute lecture series with senior US counterterrorism officials, we hosted Mike Vickers, Assistant Secretary for Special Operations and Low Intensity Conflict at the Department of Defense.

    Mr. Vickers offered his thoughts on the threat facing the US, as well as the strategy necessary to defeat the global terrorist networks -- focusing on the role of the military in this effort. Of particular interest, he explained how the Special Operations have expanded since 9/11, and how much more they will still grow this decade. In his view, this is a step in the right direction in bolstering not only the US, but our partners counterterrorism capabilities. Here is an excerpt from his talk:

    "Special Operations Forces and our Special Operations command down in Tampa has been really one of the growth stocks of the Department of Defense during this decade. By the end of the decade or probably early in the next decade, our Special Operations Forces will essentially twice as large as they were at the beginning of the decade. They'll reach about sixty-four -- the mid sixty thousands in terms of total manpower. There will have been more than a doubling of Special Operations command budget. There will be a lot more -- there already is -- but there will be a lot more flag officers and general officers who come from a Special Operations background among our senior leadership.

    "If you look at the operational core of our Special Operations Forces, and focus on the ground operators, there are some 15,000 or so of those -- give or take how you count them -- these range from our Army Special Forces or our Green Berets, our Rangers, our Seals, some classified units we have, and we recently added a Marine Corps Special Operations Command to this arsenal as well. In addition to adding the Marine component, each of these elements since 2006 and out to about 2012 or 2013 has been increasing their capacity as well as their capabilities, but their capacity by a third. This is the largest growth in Special Operations Force history. By the time we're done with that, there will be some things, some gaps we need to fix undoubtedly, but we will have the elements in place for what we believe is the Special Operations component of the global war on terrorism.

    "Special Operations Forces, I think through this decade and into the next one, have been and will remain a decisive strategic instrument. We used the -- when trying to answer the question about what made Special Operations Forces special, we like to say that well, it was because of this tactical virtuosity or the skill of the individual operator that they were trained to such a high level. My counterpart, Admiral Olson, and I now like to talk about it that it really is the strategic employment or impact that these forces cumulatively have in this broad war that we find ourselves in that really is what's making them special. It's not so much the virtuosity, though that remains and is on display almost every day overseas."

    To read the entire transcript from today's session, click here:


    2nd story:

    Air Force Wants 'Freedom to Attack' Online

    By Noah Shachtman EmailOctober 24, 2008 | 12:43:00 

    Gone are the days when the Air Force pledged to "dominate" cyberspace. Now, the flyboys just want "freedom of action" online. Oh, and the ability to deceive foes, and cyberstrike enemies at will.
    ( google formating sucks. G )

    That's according to a draft document, "Cyberspace Operations -- Air Force Doctrine Document 2-11," obtained by Inside Defense. “Freedom of action... can be seen as freedom from attack and freedom to attack,” the paper states. But, it adds, “The size and complexity of the domain and the extensive collection of networks... can make freedom of action difficult and perhaps elusive.”

    For years, the Air Force has been trying to ramp up its network war plans. But the service has had trouble deciding exactly what it wants those cyber battle plans to be. In 2005, the Air Force changed its mission statement to read, "As Airmen, it is our calling to dominate Air, Space, and Cyberspace." Then the service announced a far-reaching effort to set up a "Cyber Command," responsible for that dominance. But by August of this year, that project was put on hold, after it became painfully obvious that no one was really sure what the new command would really do (or even how to define the term "cyber.") Now, those network warriors will fall under the purview of Air Force Space Command.

    Continue reading "Air Force Wants 'Freedom to Attack' Online" »

    xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

    THEY DON'T HAVE A CYBER COMMAND IN USA.

    LET ALONE A GOLBAL Counterterrorism Cyber Network.

    GERALD

    Tactical Internet Systems analyst

    .


    Labels: ,

    1 Comments:

    Anonymous Kevlaur said...

    Freedom from attack and freedom to attack is mentioned in fundamental AF doctrine... nothing new. (see AFDD-1)

    Yep, the command is in it's infant-infancy... no base yet. Barksdale might be a good choice, but none made yet. The provisional command is now at Barksdale.

    11:58 AM  

    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    << Home