Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: LAW of Unintended consequences of globalization, blow back "al Qaeda"

  • Search our BLOG

  • HOME
    Terrorist Names SEARCH:

    Wednesday, June 27, 2007

    LAW of Unintended consequences of globalization, blow back "al Qaeda"

    LAW of Unintended consequences of globalization, blow back, "al qaeda"

    "The keyboard equals Kalashnikov" Islamofascist.
    "The keyboard equals security risk" USA forces.

    Note the paradigm divergence, which concept owns the Internet?

    "The keyboard equals Kalashnikov" new slogan among radical Islamic groups today.

    The expression, a reworking of "the pen is mightier than the sword," refers to the computer keyboard and the Russian assault rifle more commonly known as the AK47, popular among radical and terrorist groups for many decades.

    Radical groups want to go further, infiltrating mainstream, non-political, non-Islamic websites and forums to further spread their message and propaganda with their keyboard.

    The Internet was key to al-Qaida's resurrection, said terrorism expert Bruce Hoffman, a Georgetown University professor and author of Inside Terrorism. Without this most modern means of communication, he said, the group "would be like every other terrorist group in history, a localized phenomenon." Instead, al-Qaida has become "the first truly global terrorist movement." Law of Unintended consequences of globalization, blow back.

    Throughout the world, Internet chat rooms and forums are replacing mosques as venues for recruitment and radicalization, according to a report released in May by the Task Force on Internet Facilitated Radicalization, a joint group convened by George Washington University and the University of Virginia.

    Canada, Britain, Spain, the United States and other countries have felt the impact of radicalization through the Internet, said task force co-chairman Frank J. Cilluffo, director of the Homeland Security Policy Institute at GWU. There are many examples of homegrown terrorism based on Internet contact.

    The task force report noted that al-Qaeda and other terror groups now have their own production arms -- such as As-Sahab and the Global Islamic Media Front -- which produce web content, television programs, online forums, chat rooms, and video games.

    The Global Islamic Media Front has urged supporters to infiltrate non-Islamic websites and post messages defending the organization called the Islamic State of Iraq and degrading the American war effort.

    It calls on adherents to learn new web skills, and to post the propaganda messages in "non-Islamic forums such as music, youth forums, sports forums and others." Other sites encourage viewers to "assume an American identity, pick a name like 'Joe' or 'Bob' and go get an account on a non-political American [Web] forum and go in there and tell your story about your neighbor who just came back from Iraq who is now paralyzed ... and how this terrible war has ruined his life." To lie about the war and its consequences.

    The GWU-University of Virginia taskforce report noted that radical media groups push the narrative of a "clash of civilizations" between the monolithic West and monolithic Islam. It recommended that the U.S. government respond by crafting a counter narrative, reaching populations that might be prone to this message and using covert tactics to confuse the extremist chat rooms and forums.
    None of which have been done, there seems to be a lack of imagination about how to do this or a lack of will.

    "Voice of the Caliphate," with broadcasts in German.

    Al-Qaida affiliates, offshoots, and sympathizers maintain several score more sites. All are part of what Moran and others call the "online jihadi movement," which promotes an extremist ideology of violent jihad against perceived enemies of Islam. Gabriel Weimann, author of Terror on the Internet, and a long-time follower of this phenomenon, recently estimated that of 5,400 Web sites belonging to extremist groups and their sympathizers, about 70 percent are related to radical Islamists, with most espousing jihadi ideology.

    Moreover, this cyber presence is extremely tech-savvy with a high degree of interactivity between the sites and viewers, said Moran, a senior intelligence analyst at Terrorism Research Center, a private intelligence gathering firm with corporate and government clients. "These jihadist webmasters, they're not dumb, they don't live in caves," he said. "They're very sophisticated. They understand the propaganda battle very well [and how] they can use the Web as a medium to talk to people that they wouldn't be able to talk to here in America or the West."

    In a recent interview, Moran related how some sites produce videos with English subtitles designed to look like CNN or BBC News broadcasts. Friendly visitors, he said, are urged to "download it and then post it on YouTube, and on other sites that you know Americans visit." Other sites encourage viewers to "assume an American identity, pick a name like 'Joe' or 'Bob' and go get an account on a non-political American [Web] forum and go in there and tell your story about your neighbor who just came back from Iraq who is now paralyzed ... and how this terrible war has ruined his life."

    Indeed, when information specialists at the University of Arizona did a quantitative content analysis that compared eighty-six extremist Middle Eastern Web sites with fifty maintained by U.S. federal and state governments, the extremists scored much better in key areas. "We found that terrorist/extremist groups exhibited similar levels of Web knowledge as U.S. government agencies ... [and] had a strong emphasis on multimedia usage and their Web sites employed significantly more sophisticated multimedia technologies than government Web sites," the researchers wrote in the International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

    The USA war effort is suffering from a lack of imagination for the tactical use of the Internet, time after time they have managed to turn victory into defeat, by ignoring opportunities, not exploiting weaknesses, not exploiting or activating Internet Resources and Assets currently active and available. Ignoring taticial assets, and failure to deploy in this venue.

    Its like they don't know what to do.

    The private sector is performing many of these services on a Pro-bono level, and are under achieving because they are under funded and under staffed.

    And lack of response by the US government, leaves a huge gap in the flank or the war effort. The private sector lacks even the basic communications channels to report findings, subject, and perps in a timely manner. While foreign Intelligence sources are eager for this data.

    It isn't that USA can't win the information cyber war, they don't seem to know how to fight it. Their effort, "Freedom Journal Iraq" so far reminds me of scenes from "Good Morning America" with Robbin Williams, the effort so far has been equal to Robbin William's officer to produce a failed entertaining radio broadcast, off target, out dated, and off key.

    We should not surrender the Internet.
    "The keyboard equals Kalashnikov"


    More here:

    ( sourced : Internet a Front Line in Terror War, Reports Warn
    By Fred Lucas
    The Internet: Midwife of Global Radicalism?
    by Caryle Murphy..others and My comments )

    Labels: , , , , , ,


    Post a Comment

    Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

    << Home