Libya Anti-Qaddafi forces Al qaeda

More of our INTEL

Interesting paradigm shift.
Our paradigm Intel has recorded
some unusual shifts.
And we worked to develop a Hypothesis
to fit these changes.

The next day after warthogs and anti-Armour
choppers arrived on station they were withdrawn.
And the US Air force was also withdrawn from
battle.

All this happened shortly after CIA got boots
on the ground, and were doing a sitrep.

Did the CIA discover the anti-Qaddafi forces
and leaders connected to al qaeda?

In Libya: Rebel Strongholds Now, al Qaeda Wellspring Then

Did Obama discover through the CIA US forces
really were supporting al qaeda forces?

Did the choice come down to al qaeda or Qaddafi running
Libya? Which evil is lesser?

We were involved in the Egyptian demonstrations
supporting them, and talked to many, providing
Cyber Security, medical help and other operations.
Same in Syria.

And we never ran into demonstrators threatening
to turn CIA provided weapons on Americans.
We have run into this in Libya? Twice.

While by no means a scientific or statical sampling,
it gave me pause.

While I wanted to stop Qaddafi from killing
demonstrators I don't want al qaeda running
Libya.

And that hypothesis explains Gates attitude
in reference to American boots on the Ground
and the pull out of the Air Force.

Jeeze Qaddafi or al Qaeda, guess I would lean
towards Qaddafi. But there should be a third option.
But it looks like the CIA didn't find one.

Shucks, jeeze, damn.

If Iran or al qaeda is able to start a uprising,
US is hard put not to support it, and look like
US is anti-Ummah.



Gerald
Anthropologist

.