Future of Afpak

More of our INTEL

al qaeda and Taliban have switched to new very successful paradigm,
terrorist are lesser evil, US is worse evil, under guise of nationalism.


Paradigm moving towards forcing US out of Afpak.
US preparing for new covert war. Petraeus moving to CIA,
US goes CIA covert WAR, & drone war with Petraeus.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Inside Afpak paradigm


Expanded Tweets:
US Koran burning, ruse to ignite psychotic explosive Afghan 
cocktail - http://goo.gl/news/3XqI New problem 
set= http://bit.ly/ijcbQo


Taliban supports Afghan protest over Quran burning -http://goo.gl/news/u8D7

US wins every battle, kills all #Taliban mid-level cadre and still 
loose WAR, basis of inferior #Infowar

#Afghanistan #Pakistan force US withdrawal,spiral into 
econ depression, terrorist states, Blood bath and US will 
be blamed.
Paki ISI running a Terrorist Gp, Taliban - Internet Anthropologist ...


#Afghanistan #Pakistan econ to collapse,become bigger 
drug exporters see #Mexico Drug war http://bit.ly/ijcbQo


Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Inside Afpak paradigm


Its going to get very messy but cheaper.

Pakistani military's effort to clear militants from Mohmand, a part of the northwest Pakistan's tribal areas, was failing for the third time in two years. 


The report also lamented that although that four coordination centres operated by US, Pakistan and Afghan troops are up and running on the Afghan side of the border, none are yet operating on the Pakistan side despite a pledge in 2009 from Pakistan to do so. 


"The deterioration of Pakistan's economy and slow progress on economic reforms poses the greatest threat to Pakistan's stability over the medium term,"
SOURCE:


Cleaning up #Afghanistan ’s banking system - collapse of the economy possible http://t.co/ORuRdnh


Pakistan's Governments clear effort to stop drones from attacking Taliban in their
Paki sanctuaries is a clear message of insurgency support.
Kidnapping Davis and other pressures to stop sanctuary attacks.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Al-Qaeda's Pakistan PSYOP


How Taliban al qaeda set this NEW Paradigm up.






Gerald
War Anthropologist


.

IATT Cyber capabilities

More of our INTEL

We have been asked about our capabilities by
the FBI, CIA,Anonymous and others.

Even under threat we have declined specific
information on our capabilities.

To divulge our capabilities would limit operations.
To define them could nullify their effectiveness.
For the FBI we put together a power point about
some of our operations that produced actionable
Intelligence that they used.


Computer Network Exploitation is a specialty of Internet Anthropologist Think Tank. http://goo.gl/y7hmW


The Anonymous commodore in the Iranian operation
whom we worked with/for asked for our capabilities and
even threatened my destruction.
So I battened down all the hatches, called up all our
LPs and defense forces and alerted our counter surveillance
teams, and then reported to him for "Destruction",
he declined stating we were too valuable and would be
a waste of resources.

On the Iran operation Anonyous had a mole problem,
which we solved but they were concerned with our
method and the kind of data we could collect and
broke off all communication with us.
We deleted all files related to this operation.

Another Intelligence agency caught us tracking
one of their agents, and still take our reports but
have cut off all communication.
They tore his notebook apart, examined every
byte and didn't find anything.
We had reported some critical info and wanted
to be sure it was followed up on so we tracked him.
They did dispatched him to Europe for
follow up on our Intel.

We live and learn.

Our Agents are fully cloaked, stealthed, covert, secure, linked 
by encrypted IM and communications channels.
We leave no tracks or can drop a false trail leading
where we want.

We use BSU's, Bot Surveillance Units, 100,00+
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: What are BSUs.
and Pradigm Intel.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: What is "Paradigm Intel"
And COWs, Cyber Over Watch
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Don't have a COW man

And other forms of Intelligence collection.

Some times we use traps specific to our target.
Some traps have been set for 10 yrs now, waiting
for a trigger, on some targets we have set as many as 7
traps.

Some of our operations, strikes include chain functions
where up to 45 different methods are employed, like
fired from an automatic weapon.

We have also used persistent threats, setting waiting for
a slip in opsec to perform.
Other monitor conditions looking for effective environment
to activate themselves, any slip in security.
And we use vectoring, many methods any IT professional
knows about, and would exclaim they only work 10% of the
time and retrieve only small amounts of data.
But when you chain many of these simple methods
together each reporting different, bits and pieces some
times you get a big actionable picture.
Or vector an method kind of like triangulation.
If we can get some good triangulations we have
a good hit.
Some methods are like an automatic weapon,
and just fire off a chain of ventures.
Others are like a shotgun, and are not surgical
in strike capability, but a broader approach.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Taliban webmaster, IPs ...
Some are limited to tracking, others limited
to obtaining packets.
Kind of like building blocks, we package
an attack with specific blocks for specific
targets.
Lock n load packages/blocks and fire.

Some are random traps looking for a very
specific demographic, or individual.

There are sniper teams, recon teams even
combat teams.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Cyber Sniper 
We have cyber side arms and a heavy cyber weapons
squad, and believe in self defense as reasonable cause
to strike world wide. We will defend ourselves.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Hired guns: Cyberwarfare and ...

The FBI requested some specific info
and I assigned a team to do Google searches,
These are vertical searches, common Google search,
they had 10 hrs and 4 members to find the data
requested, they failed.
I used a horizontal search method and recovered
the data from Google in an hour, Google didn't index the info
we wanted but I was able to wring it out of Google
with a different method. Horizontal search.

And have contacts with a dozen Intelligence agencys.
Both inside and outside the US.
And a full battalion to draw upon, our public
Company "C" . http://warintel11.wetpaint.com/
We are looking for good Hackers.
Key members are vetted.

Our Osint is sweet and addictive, and comprehensive.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Inside view of IATT..
And now with Twitter, real time.

This is a small look into our capabilities and methods,
and by no means representative of out full capabilities.
But you get a general idea of how we work.


Gerald
War Anthropologist
Tactical Internet Systems analyst.
Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: The Internet Anthropologist Team


We welcome Secret sources: Secure, encrypted,
cloaked communications channel will be set up for you.
And set up Cyber Over Watch.
We go to great lengths to protect your ID.
Even from the US Government, the News reporters shield
applies to .Internet Anthropologist Think Tank.
10 yrs experience, tried and true.
We can with hold your ID from US Gov. if you so
wish. Or don't give us your ID.
Initial contact: internetAnthropologisttt@gmail.com
or
GeneralEmail4@gmail.com
or 
Pick a site here: http://j.mp/kbnJzT

Post info and send me the URL.

Iran, ISI, Mil, Gov, IRCG, MOIS. Japan Whalers, Taliban, al qaeda
all welcome.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: I am a Cyber Warrior

.

Kudos:

From the Executive branch, Intel agencys
and Feds.

"You're well known, frankly, the best at the game."

" It is rare to find original source, no-blink,"

Feds have said; "no complaints about Your Intel, None.."

From a Government Intelligence Contractor:

"Your site is known for reliable and timely intel. All the

other bloggers, including xxxxxxxx are just cutting and

pasting open source info. Yours offers original source

info you can't ( get ) anywhere else.

One of my best contacts is XXXXXXXXX program, they have

asked about your intel a couple of times last year, so I

know they are watching every day along with several direct

contacts up range at XXXXX. No one else is doing what you

are."

Thanks G

.

Insurgents demand reduction in American Freedoms

More of our INTEL

Afghanistan Murder Apologists Reid R. & Graham R. Call for Free Speech Limits & Koran Burning  Inquiry

SOURCE:
Message them here:
@SenatorReid & @GrahamBlog

I think its a good idea, lets carry it one step further,

lets just suspend all rights of Free speech in America,

that might cut criticism and please the Psychotics in

Afghan.

But there is no reason to stop there either, lets pack

up all the US courts and install Shariah law throughout 

USA.

Closing all the Girls schools and mandating the Berka for

all US women too. 

Or maybe impeach Reid and Graham and anyone else

who advocates infringing American rights because

of a sick psychotic minority.

While I think burning the Koran is misguided,

in the US the citizens have the right to burn ANY

BOOK.

US Troops are in Afghanistan fighting for the rights

of US citizens. And the burning of the Koran may

increase the threat against them, but the US should not

infringe in the Rights of Americans because some

psychotics are on a killing rampage in Afghan.

If the war in Afghan requires disassembling American

rights then maybe US should pull out if the US Military

can't handle the threat.

If they win the blackmail on Quran burning whats next?

Using Drones maybe?

Where is this murderous minority coming from?

Where is this extreme anti-Americanism coming from?

Its the Taliban and al Qaeda filling a vacuum in the 

Infowar realm.

Last month I posted on the insurgents in Afpak

changed their paradigm, and I out lined it is some

detail.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Inside Afpak paradigm

The insurgents, Taliban and al qaeda gave up "Teh

they are the GOOD GUYS" and have switched to

a propaganda paradigm that they are the lesser Evil.

US being the greater Evil. And are promoting it under
the guise of Nationalism, Ahmed Quraishi at
http://www.PakNationalists.com is a good example.
Spreading lies and hatred, propaganda and lying to the
Ummah.

In Afpak accusations that the Taliban is US funded

gain purchase, so weak is the US infowar.

Keep the focus on the murders, burning a Quaran

is no reason to KILL innocents.

US should not give the insurgents this victory.

US should not validate their actions by changing

American Freedoms.

Quran-burning preacher in spotlight - http://goo.gl/news/oZBE He didnot kill anyone, the Psychos in Afghan DID,keep blame on right people,

Afghan PSYCHOS BLACKMAIL @SenatorReid & @GrahamBlogfold:call for Free speech limits,both #GOPhttp://goo.gl/news/QNEd Call for Impeachment



The US is winning every battle and killing every mid-level cadre
the Taliban promotes, but US will loose the WAR unless they
correct the problems with the Infowar, spreading the Truth.

Israel made adjustment to their Infowar paradigm
which were very effective.
http://warintel.blogspot.com/2009/01/major-internet-power-shift-in-paradigm.html



Gerald
War Anthropologist

.

Libya Anti-Qaddafi forces Al qaeda

More of our INTEL

Interesting paradigm shift.
Our paradigm Intel has recorded
some unusual shifts.
And we worked to develop a Hypothesis
to fit these changes.

The next day after warthogs and anti-Armour
choppers arrived on station they were withdrawn.
And the US Air force was also withdrawn from
battle.

All this happened shortly after CIA got boots
on the ground, and were doing a sitrep.

Did the CIA discover the anti-Qaddafi forces
and leaders connected to al qaeda?

In Libya: Rebel Strongholds Now, al Qaeda Wellspring Then

Did Obama discover through the CIA US forces
really were supporting al qaeda forces?

Did the choice come down to al qaeda or Qaddafi running
Libya? Which evil is lesser?

We were involved in the Egyptian demonstrations
supporting them, and talked to many, providing
Cyber Security, medical help and other operations.
Same in Syria.

And we never ran into demonstrators threatening
to turn CIA provided weapons on Americans.
We have run into this in Libya? Twice.

While by no means a scientific or statical sampling,
it gave me pause.

While I wanted to stop Qaddafi from killing
demonstrators I don't want al qaeda running
Libya.

And that hypothesis explains Gates attitude
in reference to American boots on the Ground
and the pull out of the Air Force.

Jeeze Qaddafi or al Qaeda, guess I would lean
towards Qaddafi. But there should be a third option.
But it looks like the CIA didn't find one.

Shucks, jeeze, damn.

If Iran or al qaeda is able to start a uprising,
US is hard put not to support it, and look like
US is anti-Ummah.



Gerald
Anthropologist

.

Stuxnet Evolves:

More of our INTEL

The evolution of Stuxnet has been announced.

The capibilitues of the Stuxnet, worm, rootkit malware
are remarkable.

We have seen its Rootkit facet in hiding the
truth of what is actually going on with
the centrifuges. They malfunction by
order of Stuxnet and it forces the computer
to report every thing is fine.

Stuznet could do the opposite.
Report a machine or part is malfunctioning
when its fine. Forcing the shut down of that
component or section till it can be replaced,
again and again.

Internet Anthropologist Think Tank: Smoking Gun, Stuxnet architect.
JohnBumgarner the suspected Stuxnet architect.
Has already done that in an exercise setting.
Deceiving the system operator (or whomever) into thinking that
the system (e.g. transactional server) is experiencing some type of
mechanical failure is a very viable attack.

Back in 2000, he wrote a program that simulated a hardware failure
on well-known UNIX platform as part of a security/system
administrator test for a LARGE organization.  his code contained
valid support numbers, e-mails and error codes.   The "failure"
notices were randomize and the system "complained" that it was in
various levels of "panic."  The vendor sent engineers from around
the US to repair the system.  They replace CPUs, memory chips,
motherboards and encryption boards.  Sadly nothing corrected the
"ghost in the machine" problem and the system was offline for two
weeks (that is when he remove the code).  The security/system teams
failed the exercise.


Our paradigm intel has spotted this activity in
the wild and for Opsec reasons will not be posting
about it.

Iran is still fighting with Stuxnet a  IPR ( Invisible Persistent Rootkits )
We wrote about them 5 mos before Stuxnet was discovered.
http://warintel.blogspot.com/2010/09/yes-there-are-invisible-persistent.html

Just as confliker's paradigm allows it to persist even with
years of efforts to kill it, So to does Stuxnet's paradigm allow
it to persist regardless of Iran's efforts to remove it.

JohnBumgarner also outlined how a modified Stuxnet
could take control of key systems in Russian tanks.

Computers As Weapons Of War

( John Bumgarner, Chief Technology Officer of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit. 

http://www.usccu.us/  )

Our research and sources have confirmed vulnerabilities
in the American Electrical infrastructure to Stuxnet type
cyber attacks.

And just as Irans centrifuges are susceptible to Stuxnet
so are all nuclear cooling vulnerable to a Stuxnet type
attack.

More of John's unclassified study on the Russian/Georgian
Cyber Conflict of 2008 was published publicly.   This research is
being used throughout the world in military universities as a case
study.

Below are some of the articles from 2009 that mentioned this
research:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124701806176209691.html
http://www.informationweek.com/news/government/security/showArticle. jhtml?articleID=219400248
http://www.darkreading.com/security/cybercrime/showArticle.jhtml?art icleID=219400367
http://www.fcw.com/Articles/2009/08/24/WEEK-International-cyber- attack-fears.aspx
http://www.businessweek.com/blogs/russia_oil_politics/
http://cnews.ru/news/top/print.shtml?2009/08/17/357988
http://georgiandaily.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14121&Itemid=125
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/6048978/Russia-helped-co- ordinate-attacks-on-Georgian-websites.html
http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=56&sid=1747752
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/08/17/cyber.warfare/index.html
http://www.nationalpost.com/blogs/story.html?id=2125907
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/08/south-korea-cyber-attack
http://stage-v2.wtopnews.com/?nid=778&sid=1803720
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2009/11/15/brazils-next- battlefield-cyberspace/

The Wriggling Threat Targeted Attack Scenarios By John Bumgarner

Published one month prior to the
worm....outlined how to improve the exploit code from Xfocus and HD
Moore.  The worm author(s) used the paper to write the
worm.

All of which points to the importance of harding civilian

network against cyber attacks and the importance of

an cyber offensive force to deter cyber attacks.

Gerald
War Anthropologist
Tactical Internet Systems analyst.

.

Remote Possibility of thermo nuclear at Fukushima

More of our INTEL

We have been sitting on this story for
5 days now waiting for response from
IAEA.

Not wanting to cause a panic we sent an
Email to IAEA about our concern.

Partial copy of Email: 
Sent to IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:58 AM EST


Start:

Some things there haven't been answers to

on the WWW.

And which I've not published,

and won't as its the prerogative of the professionals

to handle.

While the spent fuel rods and some rods in #2 reactor at

Fukushima are  MOX fuel rods ( 6% plutonium ) 

And if the control rods were not fully deployed,

or if the spent MOX rods were damaged in the 

chemical explosions there is a possibility of a melt down

and temps in the 5000 to 10000 degree range.

If they aren't cooled.

This could result in a uncontrolled chain reaction

and another chemical explosion, similar to Chernobyl.

But at the 10000 degree range is there the possibility

of a thermal nuclear explosion?

Its on everyones mind, unspoken but lurking in the

backs of peoples minds. If its an impossibility I would

be happy to publish that on my blog......excerpt removed.

I know you have the best experts in the world working on

this disaster and thank the IAEA for their work.

And while I don't expect an answer,

I feel better having put my concerns in your 

capable hands.

Thank you.

Gerald

Anthropologist

End of quote:

And they never answered. 
But my sources indicate my Q
was taken very Seriously by IAEA

We have seen reports of a quarter ton of 6% plutonium

at no. 2 reactor alone.

This story has been broke by a professional

April 2 20011 so we feel free to post it NOW.

Quote from video

"ALVAREZ: Well, my concerns--I have different kinds of concerns about the plutonium. Plutonium doesn't volatilize as much as other radioactive products do. And my concern about the plutonium in that reactor is that if the reactor starts--the core, the fuel core really goes into a meltdown and the fuel starts to slump, that quarter ton of plutonium can concentrate [inaudible] there'll be too much in one place at one time. And that can cause what they call a major criticality event. Now, when this is done by design, which was the original purpose of producing plutonium, it can lead to a nuclear explosion. We don't know what kind of explosion might happen, but it could be of a nature that could destroy the reactor vessel and its secondary containment, and that's one of these scenarios where you basically say all bets are off."

SOURCE: VIDEO.

Robert Alvarez is a Senior Scholar at IPS, where he is currently focused on nuclear disarmament, environmental, and energy policies.

Between 1993 and 1999, Mr. Alvarez served as a Senior Policy Advisor to the Secretary and Deputy Assistant Secretary for National Security and the Environment. While at DOE, he coordinated the effort to enact nuclear worker compensation legislation. In 1994 and 1995, Bob led teams in North Korea to establish control of nuclear weapons materials. He coordinated nuclear material strategic planning for the department and established the department’s first asset management program. Bob was awarded two Secretarial Gold Medals, the highest awards given by the department.

Prior to joining the DOE, Mr. Alvarez served for five years as a Senior Investigator for the U. S. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, chaired by Senator John Glenn, and as one of the Senate’s primary staff experts on the U.S. nuclear weapons program. While serving for Senator Glenn, Bob worked to help establish the environmental cleanup program in the Department of Energy, strengthened the Clean Air Act, uncovered several serious nuclear safety and health problems, improved medical radiation regulations, and created a transition program for communities and workers affected by the closure of nuclear weapons facilities. In 1975 Bob helped found and direct the Environmental Policy Institute (EPI), a respected national public interest organization. He helped enact several federal environmental laws, wrote several influential studies and organized successful political coalitions. He helped organize a successful lawsuit on behalf of the family of Karen Silkwood, a nuclear worker and active union member who was killed under mysterious circumstances in 1974.

Bob Alvarez is an award winning author and has published articles in prominent publications such as Science Magazine, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists, Technology Review and The Washington Post. He has been featured in television programs such as NOVA and 60 Minutes.

As long as it is kept cool till it quits reacting it is safe.

US Spent Nuclear Fuel Largest Concentration Of Radioactivity On Planet

US nuclear reactors at risk.




Gerald
Anthropologist

Japans nuclear meltdown I 
Japans nuclear meltdown II
Japan nuclear meltdown III 
Japan nuclear meltdown IV
Japan nuclear meltdown V


Big photos, close up of devastation at Fukushima


Rebuttal:
After 8 bulling tweets I was able to get this rebuttal
for my readers:


Peter Joseph has left a new comment on your post "Remote Possibility of thermo nuclear at Fukushima":

Rebuttal to “Remote Possibility of thermo nuclear at Fukushima”

http://warintel.blogspot.com/2011/04/remote-possibility-of-thermo-nuclear-at.html

This blog and comments from Robert Alvarez are so wrong I’m driven to put them straight.


“While the spent fuel rods and some rods in #2 reactor at Fukushima are MOX fuel rods ( 6% plutonium ) And if the control rods were not fully deployed”

borated water (a neutron absorber). The shut down rods would have brought the reactor subcritical at the time of the quake. Other factors contribute to keeping a reactor critical (or subcritical), shape of the core, water moderation (flow, voids, temperature). Neutron poisons (absorbers) are also present in various forms inside a reactor. One significant neutron poison Samarium-149 actually doubles in the 15-20 days following a reactor shutdown. Removing residual decay heat is the problem that has caused the main difficulty up to this point.

“or if the spent MOX rods were damaged in the chemical explosions there is a possibility of a melt downand temps in the 5000 to 10000 degree range.”

Presumably the blog means 5k-10k Deg F? Either way the top end of 10k Deg F is far too hot . For comparison 10k Deg F is 60 Degrees above the average temperature at the surface of the sun.

“This could result in a uncontrolled chain reaction and another chemical explosion, similar to Chernobyl. But at the 10000 degree range is there the possibility of a thermal nuclear explosion?”

This information aside, even if the core of the reactor got this hot this could and would not result in an “uncontrolled chain reaction”. Why not? Because a critical nuclear fission chain reaction has nothing to do with the temperature of the nuclear material. This is one of the most common misconceptions surrounding all things nuclear. Although professionals use terms like “burn-up” and “burning nuclear fuel”, there is no burning in the conventional sense. Temperatures of nuclear fuels have no bearing on their state of criticality. Hypothetically even if nuclear fuel could reach one million degrees it wouldn’t cause a nuclear explosion.

Now to address Robert Alvarez comments. Video here (

“fuel core really goes into a meltdown and the fuel starts to slump, that quarter ton of plutonium can concentrate [inaudible] there'll be too much in one place at one time. And that can cause what they call a major criticality event. “

The notion that a non homogenous mixture of a totally melted reactor core, with various posions, and mixed with cladding, and many other materials will settle at the bottom of the reactor and then become super critical is absurd. Also there seems to be undue focus on the fact that 6% of the material is Plutonium. Criticallity can be acheived with any fissile material for example the fissile uranium has not been mentioned (further highlighting the confusion(?)) of the speaker.

Why is the notion of a nuclear explosion absurd? Nuclear explosions are not easy to achieve. They require highly enriched concentrations of fissile material, machined into specialist shapes, the addition of neutron reflectors (and usually neutron sources). Additionally the required concentrations of fissile material (say Pu239) are compressed into tiny masses many times their critical mass to create the super critical masses required to provide an exponential chain reaction. This all has to happen without the presence of anything to absorb neutrons that would hinder the creation of a runaway chain reaction.

In summary, a nuclear reactor core in operation provides probably the worst environment to create a nuclear explosion, a fully or partially melted one is even worse.


References:
#nuclear matters  http://bit.ly/go0uR5    http://bit.ly/fIe6EV


I requested the authors authority, bonifides, he refused, but I presented
his view anyway, G
AUTHORITIES COMMENTS WILL BE POSTED, CONCUR OR REBUT. G
.